Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: insights from the C-POST and KEYNOTE-630 studies.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: high-risk features remain prone to recurrence
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Adjuvant PD-1 blockade significantly improves DFS in high-risk cSCC. With the caveats of indirect comparisons and the pending full publication of one of the two trials, these post hoc findings are hypothesis generating and may help inform the selection of high-risk patients deserving adjuvant therapy.
[BACKGROUND] Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) is cured with surgery with or without radiotherapy in most cases, but patients with high-risk features remain prone to recurrence.
- 95% CI 0.26-0.62
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Cavalieri S, Ottini A, et al. (2026). Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: insights from the C-POST and KEYNOTE-630 studies.. Immuno-oncology technology, 29, 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotech.2025.101557
MLA
Cavalieri S, et al.. "Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: insights from the C-POST and KEYNOTE-630 studies.." Immuno-oncology technology, vol. 29, 2026, pp. 101557.
PMID
41567503 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) is cured with surgery with or without radiotherapy in most cases, but patients with high-risk features remain prone to recurrence. Until recently, no systemic adjuvant therapy was available. Recently, two phase III trials assessed post-operative anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1): C-POST (cemiplimab), which met its primary endpoint, and KEYNOTE-630 (pembrolizumab), which did not.
[METHODS] We compared the eligibility criteria and risk definitions of both trials. Published disease-free survival (DFS) curves were digitized, and individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed with validated algorithms. DFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank tests, Cox models, and restricted mean survival time. Subgroup analyses considered nodal high-risk patients in the two studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) informed a meta-analysis with the generic inverse variance method.
[RESULTS] The placebo arms showed no DFS difference. Although no direct comparisons can be made across trials and in spite of the different eligibility criteria of the two studies, cemiplimab achieved superior DFS versus pembrolizumab. Pooling experimental arms confirmed a DFS benefit with PD-1 therapy [HR 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71]. Cemiplimab (HR 0.36) and pembrolizumab (HR 0.44) consistently reduced recurrence risk in nodal high-risk patients, yielding a combined HR of 0.40 (95% CI 0.26-0.62) with no heterogeneity.
[CONCLUSION] Adjuvant PD-1 blockade significantly improves DFS in high-risk cSCC. With the caveats of indirect comparisons and the pending full publication of one of the two trials, these post hoc findings are hypothesis generating and may help inform the selection of high-risk patients deserving adjuvant therapy.
[METHODS] We compared the eligibility criteria and risk definitions of both trials. Published disease-free survival (DFS) curves were digitized, and individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed with validated algorithms. DFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank tests, Cox models, and restricted mean survival time. Subgroup analyses considered nodal high-risk patients in the two studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) informed a meta-analysis with the generic inverse variance method.
[RESULTS] The placebo arms showed no DFS difference. Although no direct comparisons can be made across trials and in spite of the different eligibility criteria of the two studies, cemiplimab achieved superior DFS versus pembrolizumab. Pooling experimental arms confirmed a DFS benefit with PD-1 therapy [HR 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71]. Cemiplimab (HR 0.36) and pembrolizumab (HR 0.44) consistently reduced recurrence risk in nodal high-risk patients, yielding a combined HR of 0.40 (95% CI 0.26-0.62) with no heterogeneity.
[CONCLUSION] Adjuvant PD-1 blockade significantly improves DFS in high-risk cSCC. With the caveats of indirect comparisons and the pending full publication of one of the two trials, these post hoc findings are hypothesis generating and may help inform the selection of high-risk patients deserving adjuvant therapy.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Association of immune-related adverse events with survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for lung cancer.
- Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a head-to-head trial vs. real-world comparison.
- Real-world data on anti-PD-1 plus lenvatinib as a treatment option in pretreated advanced melanoma patients - a retrospective DeCOG study.
- Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Era of TAR-200 and Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab.
- Phase II randomized study of first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab alone or with nesuparib, in mismatch-repair proficient, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (PENELOPE).
- A subset of MMR-proficient colon cancers responds to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.