본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A prospective external validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor score in the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER trial.

1/5 보강
The oncologist 2026 Vol.31(4)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
714 patients included, 58.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] The GRANT score was prospectively validated in the PROSPER study, demonstrating prognostic value for both RFS and OS, especially in nonclear RCC, further supporting its use in clinical practice. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055013.

Buti S, Kim SE, Maffezzoli M, Allaf ME, Giudice GC, Banna GL, Taguchi S, Haas NB, Carducci MA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) score is one of the prognostic models recommended by international guidelines to refine recurrence risk stratification in patients with surgically

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < .001
  • 95% CI 0.15-0.42
  • HR 0.25

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Buti S, Kim SE, et al. (2026). A prospective external validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor score in the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER trial.. The oncologist, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag041
MLA Buti S, et al.. "A prospective external validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor score in the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER trial.." The oncologist, vol. 31, no. 4, 2026.
PMID 41693026

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) score is one of the prognostic models recommended by international guidelines to refine recurrence risk stratification in patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and integrates age, tumor size, grade, and nodal status. In this study, we aimed to validate the GRANT score within the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER prospective trial.

[METHODS] We conducted a validation analysis of the GRANT score within the phase III randomized EA8143 PROSPER study of perioperative nivolumab in surgically treated RCC. Patients were classified into 2 risk groups, favorable (0-1 risk factors) versus unfavorable (2-4 risk factors). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Model discrimination were evaluated using Harrell's C-index.

[RESULTS] Among 714 patients included, 58.3% were favorable and 41.7% unfavorable based on the GRANT score. Patients in the favorable group had a significantly longer median RFS (61.1 vs. 36.9 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.48, P < .001) and OS (median not reached, HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.15-0.42, P < .001) compared to patients in the unfavorable group. The c-index was 0.63 and 0.66 for RFS and OS, respectively. A better prognostic performance was observed among nonclear cell RCC for both RFS (HR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.33, P < .001; c-index: 0.74) and OS (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, P < .001; c-index 0.74).

[CONCLUSIONS] The GRANT score was prospectively validated in the PROSPER study, demonstrating prognostic value for both RFS and OS, especially in nonclear RCC, further supporting its use in clinical practice. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055013.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Kidney Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Aged; Prognosis; Neoplasm Grading; Age Factors; Adult

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)