PD-1 inhibitor treatment outcomes for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients over 85: a comparative analysis.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
46 patients aged 71-84 and 32 patients <70, treated with cemiplimab for cSCC.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Toxicity profiles were similar, although toxicity-related deaths occurred more frequently in the >85 cohort. [CONCLUSION] Cemiplimab showed comparable efficacy and tolerability across age groups, with no significant difference in PFS and CSS, but shorter OS among very elderly patients with cSCC, reflecting competing non-cancer mortality rather than reduced treatment efficacy.
[BACKGROUND] Programmed-cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have become standard of care in the treatment of advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).
- 표본수 (n) 52
- p-value P = .002
- 95% CI 0.55-2.13
- HR 1.08
APA
Amir I, Edri N, et al. (2026). PD-1 inhibitor treatment outcomes for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients over 85: a comparative analysis.. The oncologist, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag021
MLA
Amir I, et al.. "PD-1 inhibitor treatment outcomes for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients over 85: a comparative analysis.." The oncologist, vol. 31, no. 4, 2026.
PMID
41818698 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Programmed-cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have become standard of care in the treatment of advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). However, insufficient data exists regarding treatment outcomes and safety among elderly patients, including patients aged >85.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed patients aged >85 (n = 52) and compared them with two control groups: 46 patients aged 71-84 and 32 patients <70, treated with cemiplimab for cSCC. Demographics, treatment characteristics, outcomes and toxicity were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied when comparing survival outcomes.
[RESULTS] Although patients >85 had worse ECOG scores and less inclined to undergo surgery, no significant differences were noted in the overall response rates (68.8% and 76.1% for <70 and 71-84, respectively vs. 73.1% for >85, P = .744) or disease control rates (75% and 82.6% for <70 and 71-84, respectively vs. 75% for >85, P = .627). After IPTW adjustment, progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between groups (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.55-2.13, P = .82). Cancer specific survival (CSS) also did not differ between groups (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.22-4.87, P = .955). However, overall survival (OS) was shorter among patients >85 (HR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.43-4.86, P = .002). Toxicity profiles were similar, although toxicity-related deaths occurred more frequently in the >85 cohort.
[CONCLUSION] Cemiplimab showed comparable efficacy and tolerability across age groups, with no significant difference in PFS and CSS, but shorter OS among very elderly patients with cSCC, reflecting competing non-cancer mortality rather than reduced treatment efficacy.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed patients aged >85 (n = 52) and compared them with two control groups: 46 patients aged 71-84 and 32 patients <70, treated with cemiplimab for cSCC. Demographics, treatment characteristics, outcomes and toxicity were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied when comparing survival outcomes.
[RESULTS] Although patients >85 had worse ECOG scores and less inclined to undergo surgery, no significant differences were noted in the overall response rates (68.8% and 76.1% for <70 and 71-84, respectively vs. 73.1% for >85, P = .744) or disease control rates (75% and 82.6% for <70 and 71-84, respectively vs. 75% for >85, P = .627). After IPTW adjustment, progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between groups (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.55-2.13, P = .82). Cancer specific survival (CSS) also did not differ between groups (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.22-4.87, P = .955). However, overall survival (OS) was shorter among patients >85 (HR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.43-4.86, P = .002). Toxicity profiles were similar, although toxicity-related deaths occurred more frequently in the >85 cohort.
[CONCLUSION] Cemiplimab showed comparable efficacy and tolerability across age groups, with no significant difference in PFS and CSS, but shorter OS among very elderly patients with cSCC, reflecting competing non-cancer mortality rather than reduced treatment efficacy.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
- Humans
- Male
- Female
- Skin Neoplasms
- Carcinoma
- Squamous Cell
- Aged
- 80 and over
- Retrospective Studies
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
- Antibodies
- Monoclonal
- Humanized
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
- Treatment Outcome
- Middle Aged
- PD-1 inhibitors
- cemiplimab
- cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
- elderly patients
- immunotherapy outcomes
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.