본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Real-World Outcomes for Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Melanoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Nodal Dissection.

1/5 보강
Annals of surgical oncology 📖 저널 OA 24.7% 2021: 1/6 OA 2022: 4/14 OA 2023: 6/31 OA 2024: 24/70 OA 2025: 75/257 OA 2026: 118/514 OA 2021~2026 2026 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
121 patients (78.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
combination therapy had a 2-year DFS similar to patients treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 (86
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our findings showed similar results for OS, with a 2-year OS of 98.

Herb J, Bassett RL, Torres-Cabala CA, Prieto VG, Patel SP, Holder AM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIO) followed by a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) for patients with clinically node-positive melanoma is supported by level 1 evidence.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P<0.001
  • p-value P=0.01

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Herb J, Bassett RL, et al. (2026). Real-World Outcomes for Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Melanoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Nodal Dissection.. Annals of surgical oncology. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19130-1
MLA Herb J, et al.. "Real-World Outcomes for Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Melanoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Nodal Dissection.." Annals of surgical oncology, 2026.
PMID 41838361 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIO) followed by a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) for patients with clinically node-positive melanoma is supported by level 1 evidence. Our aim was to assess the association of pathologic response (PR) and nIO regimen with survival among patients with clinical stage III melanoma undergoing nIO and TLND.

[METHODS] Our study included patients treated with nIO followed by a TLND from a large academic institution between 2016 and 2024. The pathologic response was assessed using established guidelines. Differences in extent of PR by nIO regimen were examined. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by PR and nIO regimen were assessed.

[RESULTS] The study included 121 patients (78.5% treated with combination nIO; 21.5% treated with single-agent anti-PD-1). The pCR rate was 64.2% for combination therapy and 53.8% for monotherapy (P=0.11). In univariable analysis, patients who received combination therapy had a 2-year DFS similar to patients treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 (86.5% vs 85.1%, respectively; P=0.43). Patients with a pCR had a 2-year DFS of 94.4% versus 57.3% among those with pathologic non-response (pNR) (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, PR was associated with DFS, but the nIO regimen was not. Our findings showed similar results for OS, with a 2-year OS of 98.1% for patients with pCR compared with 94.7% for those with pNR (P=0.01).

[CONCLUSIONS] Consistent with clinical trial data, the findings in this study support PR as a strong predictor of survival in this patient population. Studies investigating the de-escalation of surgical and systemic treatment based on PR as well as biomarkers of patients who can achieve a pCR after monotherapy alone are warranted.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🔓 OA PDF 열기