본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the East Asian Subgroup of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 Study.

Cancer research and treatment 2026 Vol.58(2) p. 613-621

Park SH, Chang YH, Lee JL, Choueiri TK, Kimura G, Chung J, Masumori N, Nishimura K, Kato M, Kato H, Numakura K, Chang CH, Anai S, Tsunemori H, Chen CH, Lin J, Elfiky A, Burgents JE, Kitamura H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in participants with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence after nep

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 58
  • 추적기간 62.1 months

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Park SH, Chang YH, et al. (2026). Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the East Asian Subgroup of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 Study.. Cancer research and treatment, 58(2), 613-621. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.365
MLA Park SH, et al.. "Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the East Asian Subgroup of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 Study.." Cancer research and treatment, vol. 58, no. 2, 2026, pp. 613-621.
PMID 40575946

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in participants with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy in the global phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study. This post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in East Asian (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) participants enrolled in KEYNOTE-564.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤ 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator assessment. OS was a key secondary endpoint. Safety was a secondary endpoint.

[RESULTS] The East Asian subgroup included 126 participants (pembrolizumab, n=58; placebo, n=68). Median follow-up was 62.1 months (range, 49.6 to 73.0 months). Hazard ratio for DFS with pembrolizumab versus placebo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.20). Median DFS was not reached with pembrolizumab versus 58.8 months with placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 61.3% versus 51.2%. Hazard ratio for OS was 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.49). Median OS was not reached with pembrolizumab and placebo; estimated 48-month rate was 94.8% versus 91.2%. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 70.7% of participants (29.3% grade 3 or 4) receiving pembrolizumab and 36.8% of participants (0.0% grade 3 or 4) receiving placebo. No pembrolizumab-related deaths occurred.

[CONCLUSION] In the KEYNOTE-564 East Asian subgroup, adjuvant pembrolizumab provided DFS and OS benefits versus placebo and had a safety profile consistent with the global results. These results further support pembrolizumab as adjuvant treatment for East Asian patients with RCC at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Male; Female; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Middle Aged; Kidney Neoplasms; Aged; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Treatment Outcome; East Asian People

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)