Exploratory Analysis of Biomarkers and Treatment Outcomes from the COLUMBUS Study in BRAF V600E/K-Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: BRAF V600E/K-mutant advanced melanoma
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] The greatest benefits of encorafenib plus binimetinib were observed in patients with evidence of high TMB and/or tumor-immune infiltration, suggesting potential immune contributions to efficacy, which were not observed with vemurafenib. BRAF V600 detectability in ctDNA seems to have utility as a marker of prognosis and response in this population.
[PURPOSE] Treatment with encorafenib ± binimetinib is associated with improved survival versus vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant advanced melanoma.
- 표본수 (n) 921
APA
Dummer R, Deng S, et al. (2026). Exploratory Analysis of Biomarkers and Treatment Outcomes from the COLUMBUS Study in BRAF V600E/K-Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma.. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 32(7), 1266-1276. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-3262
MLA
Dummer R, et al.. "Exploratory Analysis of Biomarkers and Treatment Outcomes from the COLUMBUS Study in BRAF V600E/K-Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma.." Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 32, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1266-1276.
PMID
41537702
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Treatment with encorafenib ± binimetinib is associated with improved survival versus vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant advanced melanoma. We retrospectively analyzed genomic and transcriptomic data from the phase III COLUMBUS trial to identify molecular correlates of benefit with encorafenib ± binimetinib.
[EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN] In COLUMBUS, patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic melanoma (n = 921) were randomized to receive encorafenib plus binimetinib, encorafenib, or vemurafenib. We used whole-exome sequencing (n = 666), whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing; n = 514), and assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline (n = 336) and on treatment (cycle 2 day 1, n = 184) to evaluate biomarker associations with progression-free and overall survival.
[RESULTS] Survival benefits with encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib were greatest in patients with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and those with evidence of tumor immune infiltration (i.e., higher cytolytic score, PD-L1 expression, or IFNγ gene signature scores). Clustering of gene expression profiles identified three tumor subgroups, including an "immune" subgroup associated with improved survival. Detection of BRAF V600 alterations in baseline ctDNA was associated with shorter survival; clearance of BRAF V600 alterations at cycle 2 day 1 was associated with improved survival across arms.
[CONCLUSIONS] The greatest benefits of encorafenib plus binimetinib were observed in patients with evidence of high TMB and/or tumor-immune infiltration, suggesting potential immune contributions to efficacy, which were not observed with vemurafenib. BRAF V600 detectability in ctDNA seems to have utility as a marker of prognosis and response in this population.
[EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN] In COLUMBUS, patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic melanoma (n = 921) were randomized to receive encorafenib plus binimetinib, encorafenib, or vemurafenib. We used whole-exome sequencing (n = 666), whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing; n = 514), and assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline (n = 336) and on treatment (cycle 2 day 1, n = 184) to evaluate biomarker associations with progression-free and overall survival.
[RESULTS] Survival benefits with encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib were greatest in patients with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and those with evidence of tumor immune infiltration (i.e., higher cytolytic score, PD-L1 expression, or IFNγ gene signature scores). Clustering of gene expression profiles identified three tumor subgroups, including an "immune" subgroup associated with improved survival. Detection of BRAF V600 alterations in baseline ctDNA was associated with shorter survival; clearance of BRAF V600 alterations at cycle 2 day 1 was associated with improved survival across arms.
[CONCLUSIONS] The greatest benefits of encorafenib plus binimetinib were observed in patients with evidence of high TMB and/or tumor-immune infiltration, suggesting potential immune contributions to efficacy, which were not observed with vemurafenib. BRAF V600 detectability in ctDNA seems to have utility as a marker of prognosis and response in this population.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
- Humans
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
- Melanoma
- Biomarkers
- Tumor
- Male
- Female
- Mutation
- Sulfonamides
- Middle Aged
- Benzimidazoles
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Vemurafenib
- Carbamates
- Aged
- Adult
- Treatment Outcome
- Retrospective Studies
- Prognosis
- Circulating Tumor DNA
- Benzamides
- Exome Sequencing
- Neoplasm Metastasis