본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Baseline tumor burden and outcomes in patients with rare cancers treated with immunotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group trial S1609).

2/5 보강
Cancer 📖 저널 OA 37.2% 2022: 2/2 OA 2023: 1/3 OA 2024: 5/12 OA 2025: 32/73 OA 2026: 43/108 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.132(7) p. e70374 OA Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI PMC OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Swiecicki PL, Othus M, Patel SP, Kwang-Chae Y, Kurzrock R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] It has been suggested that baseline tumor burden may correlate with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcome for individual tumor types in which ICIs are standardly used.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = .09
  • p-value p = .032

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Paul L. Swiecicki, Megan Othus, et al. (2026). Baseline tumor burden and outcomes in patients with rare cancers treated with immunotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group trial S1609).. Cancer, 132(7), e70374. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70374
MLA Paul L. Swiecicki, et al.. "Baseline tumor burden and outcomes in patients with rare cancers treated with immunotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group trial S1609).." Cancer, vol. 132, no. 7, 2026, pp. e70374.
PMID 41892875 ↗
DOI 10.1002/cncr.70374

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] It has been suggested that baseline tumor burden may correlate with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcome for individual tumor types in which ICIs are standardly used. The authors investigated whether pretreatment tumor burden correlates with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor regression among patients who had rare cancers treated with dual ICIs.

[METHODS] Southwest Oncology Group study S1609 was a phase 2, National Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group basket study (>1000 sites) evaluating nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 53 cohorts of patients who had rare/ultrarare malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02834013). Overall, 722 patients were included in this secondary analysis, all of whom had measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). Baseline tumor burden, defined as the sum of the greatest dimensions of target lesions at study registration, was analyzed based on quartiles observed in the data. The number of target lesions was also considered a secondary tumor burden measure. End points included OS and PFS.

[RESULTS] Larger baseline tumor burden correlated with shorter OS, but not PFS (multivariable analysis). Higher baseline tumor burden quartiles had only a weak negative association with any tumor regression at first scan (Fisher exact test, p = .09), and multivariable analyses further indicated that both tumor burden and any tumor regression at first posttreatment scan were independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis (comparing a baseline tumor size ≥12.9 cm vs. 1.0-4.8 cm; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.72; p = .032), but there was no evidence of an interaction between tumor burden and any tumor regression at the first scan (p for interaction > .65).

[CONCLUSIONS] Larger baseline tumor burden was associated with worse OS, but not PFS, and was not predictive of tumor regression after dual ICI therapy in a large cohort with rare cancer types.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기