Rethinking centralised oncology pharmacy practice in the era of flat-dose immunotherapy, subcutaneous formulations and visit-administration day separation: A conceptual analysis and reform proposal.
ObjectiveTo examine whether the centralised Oncology Pharmacy Unit (OPU) model, established in the late 1990s for BSA-dependent cytotoxic compounding, remains fit for purpose in a contemporary oncolog
APA
Iannopollo M (2026). Rethinking centralised oncology pharmacy practice in the era of flat-dose immunotherapy, subcutaneous formulations and visit-administration day separation: A conceptual analysis and reform proposal.. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 10781552261443223. https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261443223
MLA
Iannopollo M. "Rethinking centralised oncology pharmacy practice in the era of flat-dose immunotherapy, subcutaneous formulations and visit-administration day separation: A conceptual analysis and reform proposal.." Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2026, pp. 10781552261443223.
PMID
41973469
Abstract
ObjectiveTo examine whether the centralised Oncology Pharmacy Unit (OPU) model, established in the late 1990s for BSA-dependent cytotoxic compounding, remains fit for purpose in a contemporary oncology context dominated by flat-dose immunotherapy and subcutaneous checkpoint inhibitor formulations, and to propose a stratified hybrid model proportional to actual preparation complexity.Data SourcesPublished clinical trial data for subcutaneous checkpoint inhibitors (IMscin001, CheckMate-67 T, IMscin002); EMA and FDA regulatory documents (2024-2025); peer-reviewed literature on flat-dose immunotherapy, time toxicity and oncology pharmacy workflow; institutional reports from IOV IRCCS Padua, NHS England, French SFPO and the Veneto Region Pharmacy Working Group.Data SummaryFour structural inefficiencies are documented: (1) identical compounding workflows applied to pharmacologically non-equivalent preparations; (2) subcutaneous formulations with up to 80% administration time reduction routed through the full compounding circuit without clinical justification; (3) per-preparation process costs exceeding vial-sharing savings for off-patent generics; and (4) same-day compression of clinical assessment, prescribing, compounding and administration generating structural day-hospital congestion and measurable patient time toxicity. A four-level stratified hybrid model is proposed: robotic automation for high-complexity cytotoxics, simplified workflow for flat-dose IV immunotherapy, ward-based preparation for subcutaneous products, and D/D + 1 visit-to-administration day separation as an institutional standard.ConclusionThe 1999 OPU model has outlived its pharmacological context. A stratified approach to oncology pharmacy organisation - proportional to actual preparation complexity - is operationally feasible, clinically safe and necessary to restore pharmacy resources to where they generate genuine value.