본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Mortality Prediction in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Using Supervised Machine Learning Models-A Retrospective Study.

1/5 보강
Journal of clinical medicine 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 34/34 OA 2022: 61/61 OA 2023: 78/78 OA 2024: 135/135 OA 2025: 265/265 OA 2026: 192/192 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.14(22)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
412 patients with DLBCL who were evaluated, treated, and followed-up at the Regional Institute of Oncology in Iasi, Romania, between 2015 and 2023.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The Cox model achieved moderate discrimination (time-dependent AUC = 0.5561; C-index = 0.55). : Our findings align with contemporary reports showing that machine learning frameworks can outperform classical prediction approaches.

Minciuna CD, Minciuna D, Dascalescu AS, Titieanu A, Cianga VA, Antohe I

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous malignancy with variable outcomes.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Minciuna CD, Minciuna D, et al. (2025). Mortality Prediction in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Using Supervised Machine Learning Models-A Retrospective Study.. Journal of clinical medicine, 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228216
MLA Minciuna CD, et al.. "Mortality Prediction in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Using Supervised Machine Learning Models-A Retrospective Study.." Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 14, no. 22, 2025.
PMID 41303251 ↗
DOI 10.3390/jcm14228216

Abstract

: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous malignancy with variable outcomes. Accurate risk prediction at diagnosis remains essential to guide treatment and follow-up strategies. In this retrospective study we aimed to assess the performance of multiple modeling approaches to predict death by 26 months of follow-up in patients with DLBCL using data available in the diagnostic stage. : In this study we included 412 patients with DLBCL who were evaluated, treated, and followed-up at the Regional Institute of Oncology in Iasi, Romania, between 2015 and 2023. Clinical and paraclinical data determined at baseline examination was used to train and test six machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest-RF, support vector machine with a radial-basis kernel-SVM-RBF, multilayer perceptron neural network-MLP, random survival forest-RSF, and extreme gradient boosting-XGBoost) and to compare their performance to the Cox proportional hazards model. : Among the models, RF achieved the highest discrimination (AUC = 0.9060), with balanced performance (accuracy = 0.833; F1 = 0.902), followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.8335) and MLP (AUC = 0.7861; accuracy = 0.849). RF and logistic regression demonstrated the best calibration (Brier = 0.360 and 0.377). The Cox model achieved moderate discrimination (time-dependent AUC = 0.5561; C-index = 0.55). : Our findings align with contemporary reports showing that machine learning frameworks can outperform classical prediction approaches.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기