A Large Room for Improvement in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Türkiye: Real-World Outcomes in a Setting Without Access to T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
295 patients (75.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
transplantation following a response to second-line therapy, constituting the only subgroup to benefit from standard care (2-year PFS-2: 67
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음
[OBJECTIVE] Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who are relapsed/refractory (R/R) after frontline therapy have traditionally experienced highly unfavorable outcomes.
APA
Yılmaz U, Dal MS, et al. (2025). A Large Room for Improvement in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Türkiye: Real-World Outcomes in a Setting Without Access to T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.. Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 42(4), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2025.2025.0352
MLA
Yılmaz U, et al.. "A Large Room for Improvement in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Türkiye: Real-World Outcomes in a Setting Without Access to T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.." Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, vol. 42, no. 4, 2025, pp. 265-280.
PMID
41199540
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who are relapsed/refractory (R/R) after frontline therapy have traditionally experienced highly unfavorable outcomes. The development of T-cell redirecting therapies is rapidly changing that outlook, but costs and infrastructural challenges limit access to these innovative therapies. This study was conducted to document the shortcomings of management in the absence of regular access to T-cell redirecting therapies in a contemporary patient population and define the subgroups with the most urgent need for accessing innovative treatments.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] The second-line management strategies and outcomes of a large real-world LBCL cohort from Türkiye were retrospectively analyzed with the participation of 9 centers from 4 different geographical regions.
[RESULTS] Despite the contemporary nature of the treatment strategies (2012-2024), there was no regular access to novel agents. The median progression-free survival after the first progression (PFS-2) was 6.9 months. Fewer than one-fourth of all patients (24.3%) received transplantation following a response to second-line therapy, constituting the only subgroup to benefit from standard care (2-year PFS-2: 67.8%). The remaining 295 patients (75.7% of the cohort) had median survival of 6.1 months and 2-year PFS-2 of 10.3%. Progression within a year from diagnosis, non-curative intent at the second line of therapy, and failure of curative second-line therapy were key adverse features for a dismal prognosis, with median survival durations of 8.8, 2, and 7.4 months, respectively.
[CONCLUSION] The current therapeutic strategy of intensive chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous transplantation yields a reasonable chance of survival for only one-fifth of patients. The findings of this study emphasize the urgent need for expanding access to T-cell redirecting approaches in R/R LBCL for early progressors, transplant-ineligible cases, and patients who fail intensive second-line regimens.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] The second-line management strategies and outcomes of a large real-world LBCL cohort from Türkiye were retrospectively analyzed with the participation of 9 centers from 4 different geographical regions.
[RESULTS] Despite the contemporary nature of the treatment strategies (2012-2024), there was no regular access to novel agents. The median progression-free survival after the first progression (PFS-2) was 6.9 months. Fewer than one-fourth of all patients (24.3%) received transplantation following a response to second-line therapy, constituting the only subgroup to benefit from standard care (2-year PFS-2: 67.8%). The remaining 295 patients (75.7% of the cohort) had median survival of 6.1 months and 2-year PFS-2 of 10.3%. Progression within a year from diagnosis, non-curative intent at the second line of therapy, and failure of curative second-line therapy were key adverse features for a dismal prognosis, with median survival durations of 8.8, 2, and 7.4 months, respectively.
[CONCLUSION] The current therapeutic strategy of intensive chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous transplantation yields a reasonable chance of survival for only one-fifth of patients. The findings of this study emphasize the urgent need for expanding access to T-cell redirecting approaches in R/R LBCL for early progressors, transplant-ineligible cases, and patients who fail intensive second-line regimens.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
- Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Group's large B-cell lymphoma cohort.
- Exploring an independent association between rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone dose intensity and clinical outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma: Analyses of subsequent endpoints following a complete response in a real-world cohort of 1369 patients.