Indirect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib versus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 4/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
irect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab in Treatment
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Continuous treatment with zanubrutinib in treatment-naïve patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma resulted in prolonged PFS and a favorable safety profile compared with fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab. [TRIAL REGISTRATION NO] SEQUOIA (NCT03336333); CLL14 (NCT02242942).
[INTRODUCTION] Compared with chemoimmunotherapy, both zanubrutinib monotherapy and venetoclax plus obinutuzumab prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (C
- 표본수 (n) 216
- p-value P = 0.0351
APA
Munir T, Martinez-Calle N, et al. (2025). Indirect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib versus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.. Oncology and therapy, 13(4), 1055-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-025-00380-0
MLA
Munir T, et al.. "Indirect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib versus Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.." Oncology and therapy, vol. 13, no. 4, 2025, pp. 1055-1070.
PMID
40944848
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Compared with chemoimmunotherapy, both zanubrutinib monotherapy and venetoclax plus obinutuzumab prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) can be used to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens when no head-to-head trial has compared the treatments.
[METHODS] Patient matching was conducted using unanchored MAIC propensity-score weighting to compare PFS, overall survival (OS), tolerability, and adverse events (AEs) of interest (AEIs; grade 3-4 infections, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and/or thrombocytopenia and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) on the basis of data from patients in SEQUOIA for zanubrutinib and aggregate data from CLL14 for venetoclax plus obinutuzumab. Because SEQUOIA occurred during the pandemic, analyses were also conducted to adjust for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections.
[RESULTS] After matching and adjustment, baseline characteristics of the zanubrutinib group in SEQUOIA were well balanced with the CLL14 population (N = 216), with an effective sample size of 163 for the zanubrutinib group. After matching for baseline characteristics, zanubrutinib demonstrated a robust PFS benefit compared with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97]; P = 0.0351) and higher PFS probability at landmark points (60-month landmarks of 73.9% versus 63%, respectively). OS trended in favor of zanubrutinib. Overall, AEs of any grade over time were comparable in the zanubrutinib safety and venetoclax plus obinutuzumab populations. Zanubrutinib was associated with lower rates of selected AEIs compared with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab at all time points, except for grade 3-4 infections after 156 weeks. After adjusting for COVID-19, zanubrutinib was associated with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3-4 infections at 104 weeks but similar incidences of grade 3-4 infections versus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab during the overall follow-up period.
[CONCLUSIONS] Continuous treatment with zanubrutinib in treatment-naïve patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma resulted in prolonged PFS and a favorable safety profile compared with fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION NO] SEQUOIA (NCT03336333); CLL14 (NCT02242942).
[METHODS] Patient matching was conducted using unanchored MAIC propensity-score weighting to compare PFS, overall survival (OS), tolerability, and adverse events (AEs) of interest (AEIs; grade 3-4 infections, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and/or thrombocytopenia and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) on the basis of data from patients in SEQUOIA for zanubrutinib and aggregate data from CLL14 for venetoclax plus obinutuzumab. Because SEQUOIA occurred during the pandemic, analyses were also conducted to adjust for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections.
[RESULTS] After matching and adjustment, baseline characteristics of the zanubrutinib group in SEQUOIA were well balanced with the CLL14 population (N = 216), with an effective sample size of 163 for the zanubrutinib group. After matching for baseline characteristics, zanubrutinib demonstrated a robust PFS benefit compared with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97]; P = 0.0351) and higher PFS probability at landmark points (60-month landmarks of 73.9% versus 63%, respectively). OS trended in favor of zanubrutinib. Overall, AEs of any grade over time were comparable in the zanubrutinib safety and venetoclax plus obinutuzumab populations. Zanubrutinib was associated with lower rates of selected AEIs compared with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab at all time points, except for grade 3-4 infections after 156 weeks. After adjusting for COVID-19, zanubrutinib was associated with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3-4 infections at 104 weeks but similar incidences of grade 3-4 infections versus venetoclax plus obinutuzumab during the overall follow-up period.
[CONCLUSIONS] Continuous treatment with zanubrutinib in treatment-naïve patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma resulted in prolonged PFS and a favorable safety profile compared with fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION NO] SEQUOIA (NCT03336333); CLL14 (NCT02242942).