Efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies: A COVID-era ILROG collaborative report.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
219 patients from 8 different institutions treated with 255 RT courses.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Treatment of hematologic malignancies patients with hRT was generally well tolerated with few unexpected toxicities. These data provide guidance for emergencies, and hRT may be useful and could be considered even in routine settings, especially for certain patient subgroups.
[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] During the COVID19 pandemic, shorter radiation therapy (RT) courses were needed to minimize patient exposure, ensure staff safety, and conserve healthcare resources.
- 표본수 (n) 48
APA
Gunther JR, Yang JC, et al. (2025). Efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies: A COVID-era ILROG collaborative report.. Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 213, 111200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111200
MLA
Gunther JR, et al.. "Efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies: A COVID-era ILROG collaborative report.." Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, vol. 213, 2025, pp. 111200.
PMID
41052604 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] During the COVID19 pandemic, shorter radiation therapy (RT) courses were needed to minimize patient exposure, ensure staff safety, and conserve healthcare resources. In response, guidelines were published by the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) to guide treatment of hematologic malignancies patients with hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) regimens. However, outcomes for these hypofractionated dose/fractionation regimens in terms of efficacy and toxicity are unknown.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] In collaboration with ILROG, we performed a retrospective multinational, multicenter study. We included patients treated from 01 January 2020 to 01 September 2020 with hRT given according to the published ILROG guidelines or hRT given at > 3 Gy per fraction. We abstracted patient and treatment data from institutional databases. CTCAE v5.0 was used to grade toxicity.
[RESULTS] We included 219 patients from 8 different institutions treated with 255 RT courses. Median RT dose was 12 Gy (range 4-39) in a median of 3 fractions (range 1-13). Median follow up was 232 days, with 151 patients (69 %) alive at last follow up. Response within the RT field was assessed in 210 sites, and 127 sites (60 %) had a confirmed complete response. Maximal toxicities (per site) reported were Grade 1 (n = 48), Grade 2 (n = 25), Grade 3 (n = 3) and Grade 4 (n = 1). Grade 3/4 toxicities included dermatitis, pain, and hematologic toxicity.
[CONCLUSIONS] Treatment of hematologic malignancies patients with hRT was generally well tolerated with few unexpected toxicities. These data provide guidance for emergencies, and hRT may be useful and could be considered even in routine settings, especially for certain patient subgroups.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] In collaboration with ILROG, we performed a retrospective multinational, multicenter study. We included patients treated from 01 January 2020 to 01 September 2020 with hRT given according to the published ILROG guidelines or hRT given at > 3 Gy per fraction. We abstracted patient and treatment data from institutional databases. CTCAE v5.0 was used to grade toxicity.
[RESULTS] We included 219 patients from 8 different institutions treated with 255 RT courses. Median RT dose was 12 Gy (range 4-39) in a median of 3 fractions (range 1-13). Median follow up was 232 days, with 151 patients (69 %) alive at last follow up. Response within the RT field was assessed in 210 sites, and 127 sites (60 %) had a confirmed complete response. Maximal toxicities (per site) reported were Grade 1 (n = 48), Grade 2 (n = 25), Grade 3 (n = 3) and Grade 4 (n = 1). Grade 3/4 toxicities included dermatitis, pain, and hematologic toxicity.
[CONCLUSIONS] Treatment of hematologic malignancies patients with hRT was generally well tolerated with few unexpected toxicities. These data provide guidance for emergencies, and hRT may be useful and could be considered even in routine settings, especially for certain patient subgroups.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.