본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Development of a Dynamic Counterfactual Risk Stratification Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With AML Treated With Venetoclax and Azacitidine.

JCO clinical cancer informatics 2025 Vol.9() p. e2400308

Islam N, Dale JL, Reuben JS, Sapiah K, Coates JW, Markson FR, Zhang J, Wu L, Gasparetto M, Stevens BM, Staggs SE, Showers WM, Ransom MR, Desai J, Kulkarni UV, Engel KL, Jordan CT, Boyiadzis M, Smith CA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] The objective of this study was to develop a flexible risk stratification strategy for AML that is specific for venetoclax plus azacitidine (ven/aza), addresses real-world data (RWD) issues,

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Islam N, Dale JL, et al. (2025). Development of a Dynamic Counterfactual Risk Stratification Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With AML Treated With Venetoclax and Azacitidine.. JCO clinical cancer informatics, 9, e2400308. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00308
MLA Islam N, et al.. "Development of a Dynamic Counterfactual Risk Stratification Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Patients With AML Treated With Venetoclax and Azacitidine.." JCO clinical cancer informatics, vol. 9, 2025, pp. e2400308.
PMID 41329902

Abstract

[PURPOSE] The objective of this study was to develop a flexible risk stratification strategy for AML that is specific for venetoclax plus azacitidine (ven/aza), addresses real-world data (RWD) issues, and is also adaptable to different use cases.

[METHODS] A series of tunable risk models (RMs) were generated from a dynamic counterfactual machine learning (ML) strategy. These used a range of features from diagnostic AML samples and were tested using objective metrics on a single-institution cohort of 316 newly diagnosed patients treated with ven/aza. RM performance was tested using various model assumptions, data elements, and end points and with applications to an external AML real-world cohort (RWC).

[RESULTS] Favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk groups were identified in a series of ML-based RMs using different assumptions, for genetic-only or genetic-plus-phenotypic data elements and with overall survival and event-free survival as end points. Most RMs demonstrated equitable patient distribution (approximately 20%-40% in each risk group), significant separation between risk strata (log-rank-based values <0.001), and predictability computed by time-dependent survival AUC values of 0.60-0.70. Similar performance was observed when the proposed RM strategy was adapted and compared with the European Leukemia Net 2022 using the external RWC.

[CONCLUSION] The proposed ML strategy addresses a variety of RWD considerations and is readily tunable through coding and parameter updates for different contexts and use case needs. This strategy represents a novel approach to developing more effective RMs for AML and possibly other diseases.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Sulfonamides; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Azacitidine; Male; Female; Risk Assessment; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aged; Middle Aged; Machine Learning; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Prognosis