본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prognostic Value of Massiveness Parameters Measured on Baseline FDG PET in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

1/5 보강
Cancer medicine 📖 저널 OA 96.3% 2022: 15/15 OA 2023: 14/14 OA 2024: 36/36 OA 2025: 164/164 OA 2026: 215/232 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.14(24) p. e71462
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Moreover, in the bulky subgroup, medEdgeD improved prognostic accuracy (p = 0.016). [CONCLUSION] PET parameters describing massiveness, in particular medEdgeD, are significantly correlated with prognosis in HL patients for OS and PFS, especially when treated with ABVD.

Draye-Carbonnier S, Mihailescu SD, Pinochet P, Texte E, Stamatoullas-Bastard A, Vera P, Becker S, Decazes P

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] The prognostic value of radiomic quantitative features measured on pretreatment F-FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.04
  • p-value p = 0.003

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Draye-Carbonnier S, Mihailescu SD, et al. (2025). Prognostic Value of Massiveness Parameters Measured on Baseline FDG PET in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.. Cancer medicine, 14(24), e71462. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71462
MLA Draye-Carbonnier S, et al.. "Prognostic Value of Massiveness Parameters Measured on Baseline FDG PET in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.." Cancer medicine, vol. 14, no. 24, 2025, pp. e71462.
PMID 41388928 ↗
DOI 10.1002/cam4.71462

Abstract

[PURPOSE] The prognostic value of radiomic quantitative features measured on pretreatment F-FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

[METHODS] We conducted a retrospective study of 176 HL patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2017. A dozen of PET/CT-derived features were extracted via Oncometer3D from baseline F-FDG PET/CT images. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox analyses were used to assess the prognostic factors for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) censored at 5 years.

[RESULTS] Four different clusters were identified among the 12 PET parameters analyzed: activity, tumor burden, fragmentation-massiveness, and dispersion. On ROC analyses, medEdgeD, a massiveness parameter, had the highest AUC for OS (0.72) and PFS (0.6). Patients with high baseline medEdgeD had a significantly worse PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.003) in both Kaplan-Meier and Cox univariate analyses. Furthermore, medEdgeD remained statistically significant in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.008 for OS and p = 0.014 for PFS) including various TEP and clinical parameters used in daily routine. In addition, in sub-group analyses, a significantly worse prognosis was observed for patients with ABVD and with high baseline medEdgeD value (p = 0.0082 for OS and p = 0.001 for PFS). Moreover, in the bulky subgroup, medEdgeD improved prognostic accuracy (p = 0.016).

[CONCLUSION] PET parameters describing massiveness, in particular medEdgeD, are significantly correlated with prognosis in HL patients for OS and PFS, especially when treated with ABVD.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기