본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Pretransplantation Hypomethylating Agents and Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-World Analysis from the Cooperative Transplant Study Group.

Transplantation and cellular therapy 2025

Rautenberg C, Stelljes M, Bug G, Holtick U, Jost E, Jennrich S, Mohring A, Tischer J, Fraccaroli A, Schliemann C, Schmalbrock LK, Bullinger L, Metzdorf J, Braitsch K, Verbeek M, Götze K, Acker F, Reinhardt HC, Kröger N, Schroeder T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has become standard first-line therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive treatm

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 34

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Rautenberg C, Stelljes M, et al. (2025). Pretransplantation Hypomethylating Agents and Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-World Analysis from the Cooperative Transplant Study Group.. Transplantation and cellular therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.12.943
MLA Rautenberg C, et al.. "Pretransplantation Hypomethylating Agents and Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-World Analysis from the Cooperative Transplant Study Group.." Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025.
PMID 41407010

Abstract

The combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has become standard first-line therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive treatment and also is used as salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Data on outcomes after subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients with newly diagnosed (ND; n = 34) or R/R (n = 57) AML who received HMA/VEN followed by allo-SCT between 2020 and 2022. The overall response rate to HMA/VEN was 67%, with no significant difference between ND patients (73%) and R/R patients (64%). Pretransplantation measurable residual disease negativity was achieved in 49% of responders. Post-transplantation 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 52% and 42%, respectively, for the entire cohort, with similar outcomes for ND (2-year OS, 47%; RFS, 38%) and R/R (2-year OS, 56%; RFS, 45%) patients. In patients with high-risk features, such as TP53 mutation or complex karyotype (cKT), ND patients still achieved promising responses (TP53mut, 75%; cKT, 80%) and acceptable post-transplantation outcomes (2-year OS: TP53mut, 36%; cKT, 45%). In contrast, R/R patients showed lower response rates (TP53mut, 14%; cKT, 29%) and inferior outcomes (2-year OS: TP53mut, 29%; cKT, 29%). In conclusion, HMA/VEN is a feasible induction or salvage strategy enabling allo-SCT with encouraging outcomes in high-risk populations. In ND AML, this approach may expand transplant eligibility in older and frail patients; R/R patients with adverse molecular features may require alternative novel therapies or direct transplantation.