본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of B-ALL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Therapeutic advances in hematology 2025 Vol.16() p. 20406207251401313
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1330 patients, including two RCTs and six cohorts).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Overall, anti-CD20 antibody therapy was more efficacious than the corresponding control and did not increase the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. Ofatumumab may be a more effective anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of ALL.

Zhou X, Yang J, Fan J, Zhang X, Wang X, Yi H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Several clinical trials with anti-CD20 antibodies have successfully treated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.21-2.95
  • OR 1.89
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Zhou X, Yang J, et al. (2025). The efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of B-ALL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Therapeutic advances in hematology, 16, 20406207251401313. https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207251401313
MLA Zhou X, et al.. "The efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of B-ALL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.." Therapeutic advances in hematology, vol. 16, 2025, pp. 20406207251401313.
PMID 41426224 ↗

Abstract

Several clinical trials with anti-CD20 antibodies have successfully treated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Nevertheless, systematic comparisons between different anti-CD20 antibody trials are rare, and a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety has yet to be performed. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibodies in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and to guide clinical decision-making regarding the use of anti-CD20 antibody therapy. According to the PRISMA guidelines, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for clinical trials conducted up to November 1, 2024, for the evaluation of anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab, obinutuzumab, and ofatumumab) and corresponding controls. After screening the literature and extracting data, study quality was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2 tool (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (cohorts). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test. Based on the results of the heterogeneity test, meta-analysis was performed in RevMan 5.4 software with either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model. We combined data from eight studies ( = 1330 patients, including two RCTs and six cohorts). Meta-analysis showed that anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies significantly improved overall survival (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.21-2.95,  = 0.005) and event-free survival [OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.32-2.14,  < 0.0001] after >1-year follow-up, and increased complete remission rates ( < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in common adverse events between groups. Subgroup analyses by study type did not alter these conclusions. Overall, anti-CD20 antibody therapy was more efficacious than the corresponding control and did not increase the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. Ofatumumab may be a more effective anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of ALL.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기