Haematopoietic stem cell transplant in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: A multicentre propensity-score matched study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
2848 patients included in the RELCP, 51 patients underwent HSCT.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
a mean of 6
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
This could be due to patients having received a mean of 6.3 lines of treatment before HSCT. Larger studies might help identify subgroups of patients who might benefit from HSCT.
[BACKGROUND] Advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are rare, generally refractory to therapeutic options, and have a poor prognosis.
APA
Bejarano L, Grau-Pérez M, et al. (2026). Haematopoietic stem cell transplant in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: A multicentre propensity-score matched study.. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 40(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20638
MLA
Bejarano L, et al.. "Haematopoietic stem cell transplant in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: A multicentre propensity-score matched study.." Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, vol. 40, no. 1, 2026, pp. 99-108.
PMID
40065681 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are rare, generally refractory to therapeutic options, and have a poor prognosis. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), mainly allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT), is considered a potentially curative option in CTCL refractory to other therapies. However, around half of patients relapse, and allo-HSCT is associated with significant adverse events. The available evidence on the usefulness of HSCT in CTCL generally comes from isolated cases and case series with a limited number of patients.
[OBJECTIVES] Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing HSCT for advanced primary CTCL in Spain in a real-world environment and to compare their survival with that of similar patients who did not receive HSCT.
[METHODS] We performed a retrospective observational study nested within the Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry (RELCP) of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, collecting data on all patients receiving HSCT. Then, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to pair HSCT patients with non-HSCT patients, adjusting for diagnosis, highest disease stage and age at diagnosis. We then performed survival analysis by means of Cox regression.
[RESULTS] Of 2848 patients included in the RELCP, 51 patients underwent HSCT. Thirty-six patients (70.6%) achieved a complete response and seven patients (13.7%) partial response. Relapse was developed by 56.9% of patients, and 39.2% died (19.6% due to disease progression and 15.7% due to HSCT complications, mainly graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and sepsis). Overall survival (OS) after HSCT at 5 years was 58.9%. No differences in OS were found between HSCT and non-HSCT groups.
[CONCLUSIONS] We did not observe a survival benefit among HSCT patients compared to non-HSCT patients within the RELCP cohort. This could be due to patients having received a mean of 6.3 lines of treatment before HSCT. Larger studies might help identify subgroups of patients who might benefit from HSCT.
[OBJECTIVES] Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing HSCT for advanced primary CTCL in Spain in a real-world environment and to compare their survival with that of similar patients who did not receive HSCT.
[METHODS] We performed a retrospective observational study nested within the Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry (RELCP) of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, collecting data on all patients receiving HSCT. Then, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to pair HSCT patients with non-HSCT patients, adjusting for diagnosis, highest disease stage and age at diagnosis. We then performed survival analysis by means of Cox regression.
[RESULTS] Of 2848 patients included in the RELCP, 51 patients underwent HSCT. Thirty-six patients (70.6%) achieved a complete response and seven patients (13.7%) partial response. Relapse was developed by 56.9% of patients, and 39.2% died (19.6% due to disease progression and 15.7% due to HSCT complications, mainly graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and sepsis). Overall survival (OS) after HSCT at 5 years was 58.9%. No differences in OS were found between HSCT and non-HSCT groups.
[CONCLUSIONS] We did not observe a survival benefit among HSCT patients compared to non-HSCT patients within the RELCP cohort. This could be due to patients having received a mean of 6.3 lines of treatment before HSCT. Larger studies might help identify subgroups of patients who might benefit from HSCT.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.