본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of Wilms' tumor 1 gene (WT1) mutation on outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective multicenter cohort study from the ALWP/EBMT registry.

코호트 1/5 보강
Bone marrow transplantation 📖 저널 OA 38.2% 2025: 1/6 OA 2026: 20/49 OA 2025~2026 2026 Vol.61(1) p. 44-50 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
703 patients were included, 50 with mWT1 and 653 with wtWT1.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
in vivo T-cell depletion (66% vs
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In conclusion, WT1 mutation did not influence transplantation outcomes of AML patients in CR1.

Nagler A, Esteve J, Galimard JE, Sanz J, Poire X, Collin M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

We compared transplantation outcomes of AML patients with WT1 mutation (mWT1), identified by next-generation sequencing, to those of patients with wild-type WT1 AML (wtWT1).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • p-value p = 0.01
  • HR 1.14

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Nagler A, Esteve J, et al. (2026). Impact of Wilms' tumor 1 gene (WT1) mutation on outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective multicenter cohort study from the ALWP/EBMT registry.. Bone marrow transplantation, 61(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-025-02727-7
MLA Nagler A, et al.. "Impact of Wilms' tumor 1 gene (WT1) mutation on outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective multicenter cohort study from the ALWP/EBMT registry.." Bone marrow transplantation, vol. 61, no. 1, 2026, pp. 44-50.
PMID 41102401 ↗

Abstract

We compared transplantation outcomes of AML patients with WT1 mutation (mWT1), identified by next-generation sequencing, to those of patients with wild-type WT1 AML (wtWT1). 703 patients were included, 50 with mWT1 and 653 with wtWT1. Patients with mWT1 were younger (median age: 45.6 vs. 56.4 years, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of females (66% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.01), higher frequency of mutations in FLT3-ITD (38.3% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.01) and CEBPA (15.8% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.03). Donors were matched siblings in 30.6%, unrelated in 45.6%, and haploidentical in 22.1%. A higher percentage of mWT1 vs. wtWT1 patients received in vivo T-cell depletion (66% vs. 51%, p = 0.03) and 58% vs. 47.1% received myeloablative conditioning. 49 patients with mWT1 were matched to 127 wtWT1 patients in matched-pairs analysis. Outcomes (mWT1 vs. wtWT1) were not significantly different: relapse (2 y: 28.8% vs. 30.4%, HR: 1.14, p = 0.64), NRM (2 y: 15.5% vs. 9.9%, HR: 1.41, p = 0.49), LFS (2 y: 55.7% vs. 59.6%, HR: 1.21, p = 0.39), OS (2 y: 65.4% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.66), and chronic GVHD (2 y:24.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.95). In conclusion, WT1 mutation did not influence transplantation outcomes of AML patients in CR1.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기