Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin with or without rituximab is highly effective as a mobilization regimen in relapsed or refractory lymphoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
GDP±R before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and were mobilized with either GDP±R or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a peripheral blood stem cell mobilization at day 15 following GDP±R. It is highly effective and represents a better option due to its simplicity of administration, low rate of hospitalization and low cost.
[INTRODUCTION] A combination of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (GDP) with or without rituximab (±R) is an outpatient treatment widely used for relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma.
APA
Taillefer VT, Emond M, et al. (2026). Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin with or without rituximab is highly effective as a mobilization regimen in relapsed or refractory lymphoma.. Leukemia research reports, 25, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrr.2026.100566
MLA
Taillefer VT, et al.. "Gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin with or without rituximab is highly effective as a mobilization regimen in relapsed or refractory lymphoma.." Leukemia research reports, vol. 25, 2026, pp. 100566.
PMID
41660056 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] A combination of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (GDP) with or without rituximab (±R) is an outpatient treatment widely used for relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma. Limited data are available on stem cell mobilization following GDP treatment.
[METHOD] A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 1st, 2014, to December 31st, 2020. Patients received GDP±R before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and were mobilized with either GDP±R or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY). The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients achieving ≥2 × 10 CD34/kg, median CD34 yield, and number of apheresis days. The secondary objective compared these results with ID-CY.
[RESULTS] Ninety-two patients (median age 54) were treated for diffuse large B-cell (40%), Hodgkin (36%), or follicular lymphoma (16%). Of these, 83 were mobilized with GDP±R and 9 with ID-CY. G-CSF was administered at 5 mcg/kg (61%) or 10 mcg/kg (37%) daily, typically starting on day 9, after two GDP cycles. A successful stem cell collection at the first attempt occurred in 96% of GDP±R patients, and 94% of patients proceeded to ASCT. No significant difference was found between GDP±R and ID-CY in terms of successful collection (96% vs. 100%, =NS), but fewer hospitalizations occurred within 21 days of mobilization (1% vs. 22%, = 0.02).
[CONCLUSION] This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a peripheral blood stem cell mobilization at day 15 following GDP±R. It is highly effective and represents a better option due to its simplicity of administration, low rate of hospitalization and low cost.
[METHOD] A retrospective multicenter study was conducted from January 1st, 2014, to December 31st, 2020. Patients received GDP±R before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and were mobilized with either GDP±R or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY). The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients achieving ≥2 × 10 CD34/kg, median CD34 yield, and number of apheresis days. The secondary objective compared these results with ID-CY.
[RESULTS] Ninety-two patients (median age 54) were treated for diffuse large B-cell (40%), Hodgkin (36%), or follicular lymphoma (16%). Of these, 83 were mobilized with GDP±R and 9 with ID-CY. G-CSF was administered at 5 mcg/kg (61%) or 10 mcg/kg (37%) daily, typically starting on day 9, after two GDP cycles. A successful stem cell collection at the first attempt occurred in 96% of GDP±R patients, and 94% of patients proceeded to ASCT. No significant difference was found between GDP±R and ID-CY in terms of successful collection (96% vs. 100%, =NS), but fewer hospitalizations occurred within 21 days of mobilization (1% vs. 22%, = 0.02).
[CONCLUSION] This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing a peripheral blood stem cell mobilization at day 15 following GDP±R. It is highly effective and represents a better option due to its simplicity of administration, low rate of hospitalization and low cost.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Impact of Comorbidities on Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Palbociclib in the POLARIS Study.
- Key Considerations for Targeting in Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Impact on the Treatment Paradigm.
- Overcoming Chemoresistance in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Strategies, and Functional Precision Medicine.
- Current Systemic Treatment Options for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer-An Overview Article.
- Balancing safety and efficacy of Bendamustine plus anti CD20 regimens in elderly patients (> 70 y) with follicular lymphoma: a tertiary academic center experience.