본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events in a large clinical trial: findings from the phase 3 POLARIX study.

Blood 2026 Vol.147(3) p. 254-265

Thompson C, Trněný M, Morschhauser F, Salles G, Reagan PM, Hertzberg M, Zhang H, Thieblemont C, Hu B, Fonseca G, Kim WS, Martelli M, Mehta A, Singh A, Yan M, Hirata J, Sugidono M, Lee C, Sharman JP, Mehta-Shah N, Flowers CR, Tilly H, Chua N, Casasnovas RO, Miall F, Kim TM, Tsai XC, Nasta S, Lee ST, Friedberg JW

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQo

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 874

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Thompson C, Trněný M, et al. (2026). PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events in a large clinical trial: findings from the phase 3 POLARIX study.. Blood, 147(3), 254-265. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2025028848
MLA Thompson C, et al.. "PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events in a large clinical trial: findings from the phase 3 POLARIX study.." Blood, vol. 147, no. 3, 2026, pp. 254-265.
PMID 40997297

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The phase 3 POLARIX study demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a similar safety profile with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) vs R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Here, we evaluate HRQoL through patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to fully characterize the patient experience in the POLARIX study. Changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were assessed, as well as incidence and severity of common symptoms by PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics of PRO-evaluable patients (N = 874) were consistent. Comparison between PROs and clinician-reported AEs revealed a notable discordance; patients generally reported a higher incidence of symptoms than clinicians, emphasizing the need for patient-centric tools to accurately capture the patient experience. Both treatments exhibited rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms, with the most substantial improvements seen in global health status/QoL, lymphoma symptoms, fatigue, role, emotional, and social functioning. GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) were generally similar between treatment arms and returned to baseline levels after treatment completion. These HRQoL data underscore the complementarity of PROs, as an adjunct to clinician-reported AEs, in evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments, including Pola-R-CHP, which may represent a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03274492.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Vincristine; Quality of Life; Cyclophosphamide; Aged; Prednisone; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Adult; Doxorubicin; Rituximab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Aged, 80 and over

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)