본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities.

1/5 보강
Haematologica 📖 저널 OA 81.3% 2021: 1/1 OA 2024: 1/1 OA 2025: 24/56 OA 2026: 164/196 OA 2021~2026 2026 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

Boussi L, Bewersdorf JP, Liu Y, Shallis RM, Aguirre LE, Bystrom RP, Zucenka A, Garciaz S, DeAngelo DJ, Stone RM, Luskin MR, Garcia JS, Winer ES, Chen EC, Wadleigh M, Berton G, Ling K, Zeidan AM, Stein EM, Shimony S, Goldberg AD, Stahl M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Abnormalities in chromosomes 5 and 7 are frequently identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly enriched in therapy-and myelodysplasia-related disease, and confer an adverse prognosis.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p=0.0324
  • p-value p=0.0266

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Boussi L, Bewersdorf JP, et al. (2026). Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities.. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.288891
MLA Boussi L, et al.. "Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities.." Haematologica, 2026.
PMID 41609030 ↗

Abstract

Abnormalities in chromosomes 5 and 7 are frequently identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly enriched in therapy-and myelodysplasia-related disease, and confer an adverse prognosis. Given the high risk of relapse, allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) is typically recommended for patients achieving complete remission (CR) following induction chemotherapy. We currently lack prospective data to decide whether intensive chemotherapy (IC) versus hypomethylating agent+venetoclax (HMA+ven) is the superior frontline treatment approach for these patients. Hence, we performed a retrospective study in a large cohort of patients with AML and deletion 7 (-7) and/or deletion 5 or 5q (-5/del5q) comparing outcomes between IC-versus HMA+ven-treated patients. Remission rates after IC and HMA+ven were found to be comparable (43% vs 52%, p=0.2). When adjusting for patient and disease characteristics in multivariable analysis (MVA), treatment with IC vs HMA+ven did not significantly impact overall survival (OS) (HR 1.02, p=0.9202), while age at diagnosis (HR 1.02, p=0.0324), prior myeloid disease (HR 1.42, p=0.0266), monosomal karyotype (HR 1.48, p=0.029), complex karyotype (HR 1.61, p=0.0156), and KRAS mutations (HR 2.21, p=0.0063) were associated with inferior survival. There was also no difference in OS in patients age 60-75 years by treatment strategy (7.8 vs 6.4 months, p=0.56), motivating future randomized trials of IC versus HMA+ven in this older population to inform optimal therapy. Importantly, OS was significantly improved in patients undergoing allo-SCT irrespective of frontline therapy, and allo-SCT consolidation was the most important predictor of long-term survival in MVA (HR 0.36, p.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🔓 OA PDF 열기