본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin versus conventional chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

1/5 보강
International journal of hematology 2026 Vol.123(2) p. 208-214
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
86 patients with first relapse or primary refractory DLBCL, 32 received PBR in any subsequent line, while 54 received conventional chemotherapy alone.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
PBR in any subsequent line, while 54 received conventional chemotherapy alone
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Despite this older age distribution, the PBR group showed a trend toward favorable progression-free survival. These results suggest that PBR therapy is more effective and tolerable than conventional chemotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Mishina T, Manako C, Sugawara T, Tsujimura H, Kumagai K, Takeuchi M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, particularly in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation or cellular immunotherapy.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = 0.025

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Mishina T, Manako C, et al. (2026). Efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin versus conventional chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.. International journal of hematology, 123(2), 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-025-04084-z
MLA Mishina T, et al.. "Efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin versus conventional chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.." International journal of hematology, vol. 123, no. 2, 2026, pp. 208-214.
PMID 41094327

Abstract

Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, particularly in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation or cellular immunotherapy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin combined with rituximab and bendamustine (PBR) therapy in comparison to conventional chemotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL. Of 86 patients with first relapse or primary refractory DLBCL, 32 received PBR in any subsequent line, while 54 received conventional chemotherapy alone. For comparison, 32 baseline-matched patients were selected from these 54 and defined as the conventional chemotherapy group. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 17.3 months (range, 1.5-85.7 months), with the PBR-treated group showing significantly improved outcomes (median OS 19.7 vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.025). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified PBR as a favorable prognostic factor for OS. In the second-line setting, 41.2% of patients who received PBR were ≥ 80 years, compared with just 11.1% of those who received salvage regimens. Despite this older age distribution, the PBR group showed a trend toward favorable progression-free survival. These results suggest that PBR therapy is more effective and tolerable than conventional chemotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Male; Aged; Female; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Rituximab; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Immunoconjugates; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies