본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

From pixels to prognosis: A QUADAS-2-Guided systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning segmentation for DLBCL in PET and PET/CT.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Cancer treatment and research communications 📖 저널 OA 27.3% 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 1/15 OA 2026: 32/104 OA 2023~2026 2026 Vol.47() p. 101144 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

Keshavarz S, Saeedzadeh E, Arabi H, Sardari D, Jenabi-Haghparast E, Dadgar H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the performance and methodological quality of deep learning models for automated segmentation of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) on PET/CT imag

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.791-0.827
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Keshavarz S, Saeedzadeh E, et al. (2026). From pixels to prognosis: A QUADAS-2-Guided systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning segmentation for DLBCL in PET and PET/CT.. Cancer treatment and research communications, 47, 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101144
MLA Keshavarz S, et al.. "From pixels to prognosis: A QUADAS-2-Guided systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning segmentation for DLBCL in PET and PET/CT.." Cancer treatment and research communications, vol. 47, 2026, pp. 101144.
PMID 41719779 ↗

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the performance and methodological quality of deep learning models for automated segmentation of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) on PET/CT imaging. A comprehensive literature search identified 15 eligible studies that were published up to July 2025. Of these, 11 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, while 4 were assessed qualitatively. Using a random-effects model, the pooled mean DSC was 0.809 (95% CI: 0.791-0.827), indicating strong overall segmentation performance. The reported DSC values across the individual studies ranged from 0.65 to 0.886. Single-center studies generally showed slightly higher median DSC values (≈0.82) than multi-center studies (≈0.78), although pooled subgroup analyses revealed comparable averages (0.77 vs. 0.73). Methodological quality, assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, showed that most studies (approximately 67-73%) were at low risk of bias, with the remainder classified as moderate or unclear. Despite the variability in algorithms, study designs, and datasets, DL-based methods have consistently achieved reliable segmentation accuracy. Overall, DL models demonstrated promising potential for automated DLBCL segmentation in PET/CT imaging. Nevertheless, future studies should focus on larger and more diverse cohorts, improved reporting standards, and transparent handling of methodological limitations to enhance generalizability and clinical applicability.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기