본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Patient and professional use of the root coverage esthetic score (RES) and how it relates to patient satisfaction following periodontal plastic surgery.

2/5 보강
BMC oral health 2022 Vol.22(1) p. 295
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
34 subjects were included, presenting 46 treated recessions.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] The root coverage esthetic score assessment can be conducted by patients and was not statistically significant different to that of the professional. Patient satisfaction is not always dependent on complete root coverage or the other clinical parameters included in the root coverage esthetic score.

Sørdahl AJ, Verket A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 치주 재건술 후 뿌리 노출 부위 치료 결과에 대해 환자가 전문가보다 미적 결과를 더 긍정적으로 평가한다는 기존 보고와 달리, 뿌리 피복 미적 점수(Root Coverage Esthetic Score, RES)를 환자가 직접 사용할 수 있는지 확인하고자 했다.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sørdahl AJ, Verket A (2022). Patient and professional use of the root coverage esthetic score (RES) and how it relates to patient satisfaction following periodontal plastic surgery.. BMC oral health, 22(1), 295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02326-8
MLA Sørdahl AJ, et al.. "Patient and professional use of the root coverage esthetic score (RES) and how it relates to patient satisfaction following periodontal plastic surgery.." BMC oral health, vol. 22, no. 1, 2022, pp. 295.
PMID 35850680

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Following periodontal plastic surgery in the treatment of recession defects, previous studies have reported that patients rate the esthetic outcomes more favorable than dental professionals. The root coverage esthetic score has been developed and suggested to serve as a comprehensive assessment instrument as it addresses several esthetic outcomes following root coverage procedures. However, no study has yet reported on patient use of this instrument. In the present study clinical, esthetic and patient-reported outcomes following periodontal plastic surgery were assessed. The primary objective was to compare the esthetic/clinical outcome as judged by the patient and by one dentist by using the root coverage esthetic score. The secondary objective was to evaluate the correlation between patient-reported outcomes, root coverage esthetic score and clinical parameters following treatment of recession defects.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Subjects that had undergone periodontal plastic surgery were invited to score the treatment outcome according to the root coverage esthetic score, which subsequently also was professionally scored by a dentist. Thereafter, the subjects answered a questionnaire on patient satisfaction. All types of surgical root coverage procedures in canine or incisor teeth were included.

[RESULTS] A total of 34 subjects were included, presenting 46 treated recessions. No statistically significant different score was found comparing the root coverage esthetic score by the patient and the professional. The majority of subjects was satisfied with the treatment outcome, and most would have undergone the treatment again.

[CONCLUSION] The root coverage esthetic score assessment can be conducted by patients and was not statistically significant different to that of the professional. Patient satisfaction is not always dependent on complete root coverage or the other clinical parameters included in the root coverage esthetic score.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 root scispacy 1
합병증 incisor teeth scispacy 1
약물 RES → root coverage esthetic score scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
질환 RES → root coverage esthetic score scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Esthetics, Dental; Gingiva; Gingival Recession; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Patient Satisfaction; Surgery, Plastic; Tooth Root; Treatment Outcome