본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2026 Vol.44(6) p. 476-485

Woyach JA, Qiu L, Grosicki S, Wrobel T, Capra M, Czyz J, Yi S, Eom KS, Panovská A, Jurczak W, Laribi K, Jacobasch L, Baker R, Agajanian R, Berkovits A, Özcan M, Lepretre S, Coombs CC, Cramer P, Lewis KL, Hill M, Bao K, Bian Y, De Batista Ribeiro SR, Bhandari NR, Ruppert AS, Leow CC, Wierda WG

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 662
  • 95% CI 82.9 to 90.4

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Woyach JA, Qiu L, et al. (2026). Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 44(6), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-02477
MLA Woyach JA, et al.. "Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.." Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 44, no. 6, 2026, pp. 476-485.
PMID 41353787

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat [ITT]) and in patients with RR disease.

[RESULTS] The study met its primary end points, demonstrating statistically significant noninferiority (NI) of IRC-ORR for pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in both the ITT (87.0% [95% CI, 82.9 to 90.4] 78.5% [95% CI, 73.7 to 82.9]; ORR ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.19]; two-sided < .0001) and R/R populations (n = 437; 84.0% [95% CI, 78.5 to 88.6] 74.8% [95% CI, 68.5 to 80.4]; ORR ratio = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24]; two-sided < .0001). In TN patients (n = 225), IRC-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI, 86.4 to 96.9) with pirtobrutinib versus 85.8% (95% CI, 78.0 to 91.7) with ibrutinib. Investigator assessed ORR results were consistent. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) favored pirtobrutinib in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83]), R/R (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.13]), and TN (HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.59]) populations. Cardiac adverse event rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter and hypertension were lower with pirtobrutinib.

[CONCLUSION] Pirtobrutinib demonstrated NI of ORR versus ibrutinib, with a favorable early PFS trend, particularly in TN patients, and a favorable safety profile including low rates of atrial fibrillation and hypertension.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Adenine; Piperidines; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Female; Aged; Middle Aged; Pyrimidines; Aged, 80 and over; Pyrazoles; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Adult; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Progression-Free Survival; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local