본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Three-Year Follow-Up of Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD in Adolescents With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma on S1826.

1/5 보강
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 📖 저널 OA 33.5% 2022: 4/6 OA 2024: 4/10 OA 2025: 30/61 OA 2026: 35/143 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.44(6) p. 449-454
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
994 patients enrolled, 24% (n = 240) were age 12-17 years.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
protocol-specified residual site radiotherapy (RT)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
N-AVD demonstrated high 3-year PFS in adolescents with AS cHL, with minimal RT use. S1826 exemplifies the benefits of harmonized clinical trial protocols, resulting in timely access to novel agents for adolescents.

Castellino SM, Li H, Herrera AF, LeBlanc M, Parsons SK, Unger JM, Punnett A, Hodgson D, Keller FG, Drachtman RA, Lamble A, Forlenza CJ, Doan A, Rutherford SC, Evens AM, Little RF, Smith MA, Hoppe BS, Song JY, Smith SM, Friedberg JW, Kelly KM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

We present a subset analysis on the adolescent cohort of the S1826 randomized phase three trial, comparing nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (N-AVD) to brentuximab vedotin-AVD (BV-AVD)

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 240
  • 95% CI 87 to 96

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Castellino SM, Li H, et al. (2026). Three-Year Follow-Up of Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD in Adolescents With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma on S1826.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 44(6), 449-454. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00203
MLA Castellino SM, et al.. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD in Adolescents With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma on S1826.." Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 44, no. 6, 2026, pp. 449-454.
PMID 41512237 ↗

Abstract

We present a subset analysis on the adolescent cohort of the S1826 randomized phase three trial, comparing nivolumab, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (N-AVD) to brentuximab vedotin-AVD (BV-AVD) in newly diagnosed advanced-stage (AS, stages III and IV) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Among 994 patients enrolled, 24% (n = 240) were age 12-17 years. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the N-AVD group (93% [95% CI, 87 to 96]) compared with the BV-AVD group (82% [95% CI, 73 to 88]; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.80]). One N-AVD and two BV-AVD patients received protocol-specified residual site radiotherapy (RT). Rates of febrile neutropenia and sepsis were low in both groups. Severe immune-related adverse events were infrequent, although thyroid dysfunction was seen in 7% with N-AVD. Sensory neuropathy (grade ≥2) was more frequent with BV-AVD (14% 7%) by clinician report. Although premature discontinuation of therapy was reported in 12 N-AVD patients and four BV-AVD patients, no PFS events were noted in the N-AVD group. Patient-reported outcomes indicated less toxicity with N-AVD. N-AVD demonstrated high 3-year PFS in adolescents with AS cHL, with minimal RT use. S1826 exemplifies the benefits of harmonized clinical trial protocols, resulting in timely access to novel agents for adolescents.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반