Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats.
This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in apparently healthy and sick shelter cats in Mississippi and estimate the predictive value of a lateral f
APA
Urig HE, Woodruff KA, et al. (2026). Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats.. Frontiers in veterinary science, 13, 1752228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1752228
MLA
Urig HE, et al.. "Feline leukemia virus point-of-care lateral flow tests have low positive predictive value in apparently healthy shelter cats.." Frontiers in veterinary science, vol. 13, 2026, pp. 1752228.
PMID
41868399
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in apparently healthy and sick shelter cats in Mississippi and estimate the predictive value of a lateral flow test results at the estimated true prevalences to guide testing recommendations. Blood samples ( = 383) were collected from a convenience sample of healthy and sick cats from February 2021 to July 2023. Blood serum samples from both apparently healthy and sick cats were tested for FeLV using lateral flow and insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) testing methods. Bayesian latent class modeling was used to estimate test performance and predictive value in both populations. The estimated true prevalence of FeLV in apparently healthy cats was 0.8% (95% CI 0.1%, 2.2%) and 5.3% (95% CI 1.3%, 11.5%) in sick cats. At these prevalences, the estimated positive predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 40.1% (95% CI 4.1%, 85.2%) and 99.0% (95% CI 99.4%, 100%) in sick cats. Negative predictive value of FeLV in healthy cats was 79.8% (95% CI 45.2%, 96.8%) and 99.2% (95% CI 97.1%, 100%) in sick cats. The predictive value of a positive test is low for healthy cats. Serial testing may not meaningfully improve the positive predictive value. Positive and negative predictive values were better for sick cats and may have diagnostic utility. Current testing methods may not be adequate for controlling the disease in population.