본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Real-world comparative effectiveness of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

코호트 1/5 보강
Blood advances 📖 저널 OA 98.7% 2021: 1/1 OA 2025: 59/59 OA 2026: 164/167 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.10(5) p. 1457-1468 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
698 patients who received 2L/3L cBTKi monotherapy, 49%, 32%, and 19% received acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib, respectively.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
second- or third-line (2L/3L) zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, or ibrutinib monotherapy, on or after 1 January 2018, were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Toxicity was a frequent reason for changing to another cBTKi. These findings suggest potential improvements in rwTTNT and rwOS with the use of second- and next-generation cBTKis for R/R MCL from 2018 and beyond.

Phillips T, Di M, Miller TA, Wang J, Pierre A, Maglinte GA, Seymour EK, Wang Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This real-world retrospective cohort study evaluated utilization and comparative effectiveness of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapies in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lym

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 10.5-15.6
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Phillips T, Di M, et al. (2026). Real-world comparative effectiveness of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.. Blood advances, 10(5), 1457-1468. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017160
MLA Phillips T, et al.. "Real-world comparative effectiveness of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.." Blood advances, vol. 10, no. 5, 2026, pp. 1457-1468.
PMID 41269777 ↗

Abstract

This real-world retrospective cohort study evaluated utilization and comparative effectiveness of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapies in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL) from electronic health records in the United States. Adults with R/R MCL who received second- or third-line (2L/3L) zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, or ibrutinib monotherapy, on or after 1 January 2018, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used in adjusted Cox models to compare real-world time-to-next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS). Among 698 patients who received 2L/3L cBTKi monotherapy, 49%, 32%, and 19% received acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib, respectively. Unadjusted analyses showed median rwTTNT for 2L zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, and ibrutinib was 14.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.0-23.2), 12.8 (95% CI, 10.5-15.6), and 10.3 (95% CI, 7.6-13.7) months, and median rwOS was 26.4 (95% CI, 23.2 to not reached [NR]), 29.2 (95% CI, 22.9-38.1), and 29.3 (95% CI, 21.8-41.6) months, respectively. Median rwTTNT for 3L zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, and ibrutinib was 21.1 (95% CI, 3.9 to NR), 9.2 (95% CI, 6.8-14.7), and 9.6 (95% CI, 4.8-18.0) months, and median rwOS was NR (95% CI, 27.3 to NR), 27.4 (95% CI, 15.1-42.2), and 27.0 (95% CI, 15.6 to NR) months, respectively. Adjusted models in the 2L/3L cohorts combined showed numerically longer rwTTNT and statistically significantly longer rwOS for zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96), and trends for improved rwTTNT and rwOS for zanubrutinib over acalabrutinib. Toxicity was a frequent reason for changing to another cBTKi. These findings suggest potential improvements in rwTTNT and rwOS with the use of second- and next-generation cBTKis for R/R MCL from 2018 and beyond.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기