Enhanced Visualization: Transforming Non-Contrast into Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Through Advanced Generative Adversarial Networks.
1/5 보강
Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) is essential for mediastinal and lymph node assessment but is often limited in patients with renal dysfunction, prior severe contrast reactions, or pediatric populations.
APA
Kim HS, Gil BM, et al. (2026). Enhanced Visualization: Transforming Non-Contrast into Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Through Advanced Generative Adversarial Networks.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16060861
MLA
Kim HS, et al.. "Enhanced Visualization: Transforming Non-Contrast into Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Through Advanced Generative Adversarial Networks.." Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 6, 2026.
PMID
41897594
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) is essential for mediastinal and lymph node assessment but is often limited in patients with renal dysfunction, prior severe contrast reactions, or pediatric populations. Deep learning approaches, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), allow the generation of synthetic CECT (sCECT) from non-contrast CT (NCCT) without contrast injection. A GAN-based model was trained using 400 CECT scans acquired between March and July 2024. The model was tested in 20 patients with lymphoma or metastatic lymphadenopathy diagnosed between January and July 2025, using only NCCT scans. Quantitative evaluation compared sCECT with CECT using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC). Two radiologists performed qualitative assessment, and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)/Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) values were measured for thoracic structures. Compared with NCCT, sCECT demonstrated slightly lower MAE (20.87 ± 8.84 vs. 21.26 ± 9.26) and RMSE (45.22 ± 14.22 vs. 45.94 ± 15.07), and marginally higher PSNR (15.44 ± 2.70 vs. 15.38 ± 3.02), indicating modest improvements in pixel-wise similarity. SSIM values were comparable (0.610 ± 0.09 vs. 0.63 ± 0.10), while PCC decreased (0.61 ± 0.09 vs. 0.77 ± 0.15). All differences were statistically significant ( < 0.001). Despite these mixed quantitative results, sCECT was qualitatively rated significantly higher by radiologists, with improved visualization of mediastinal structures. SNR and CNR analyses further supported enhanced contrast depiction in sCECT compared with NCCT. The GAN-based model successfully generated sCECT from NCCT with modest quantitative similarity gains but clear qualitative improvement, particularly for mediastinal lymph node evaluation. Although synthetic enhancement represents a learned intensity transformation rather than true iodine-based attenuation, sCECT may serve as a valuable adjunct in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Free-flap reconstruction in recurrent head and neck cancer: A retrospective review of 124 cases.
- A clinical evaluation of botulinum toxin-A injections in the temporomandibular disorder treatment.
- Erratum: [Corrigendum] Role of EphA2-PI3K signaling in vasculogenic mimicry induced by cancer-associated fibroblasts in gastric cancer cells.
- Isolation of Exosomes from MDA-MB-231 Cells Using a Paddle Screw System and Detection of TNBC-Associated Exosomal miRNAs.
- DICER1 -Associated Gynecologic Neoplasms: An Update and Review.