본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of Novel Therapies on the Efficacy of Post-Transplantation Brentuximab Vedotin Maintenance in Hodgkin Lymphoma.

1/5 보강
Blood advances 📖 저널 OA 99.1% 2021: 1/1 OA 2025: 59/59 OA 2026: 165/167 OA 2021~2026 2026 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1091 patients with R/R cHL who underwent ASCT between 2010-2022.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
ASCT between 2010-2022
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The benefit of BV maintenance appears to be attenuated for patients receiving novel agents with salvage therapy. Omission of BV maintenance should be considered for patients anticipated to have excellent outcomes.

Falade AS, Redd R, Desai SH, Moskowitz AJ, Shah HR, Geyer S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) could impact the benefit of post-ASCT BV maintenance in relapsed/refractory (R/

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p=0.083
  • p-value p<0.001
  • 95% CI 70-78

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Falade AS, Redd R, et al. (2026). Impact of Novel Therapies on the Efficacy of Post-Transplantation Brentuximab Vedotin Maintenance in Hodgkin Lymphoma.. Blood advances. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018683
MLA Falade AS, et al.. "Impact of Novel Therapies on the Efficacy of Post-Transplantation Brentuximab Vedotin Maintenance in Hodgkin Lymphoma.." Blood advances, 2026.
PMID 41894690 ↗

Abstract

Use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) could impact the benefit of post-ASCT BV maintenance in relapsed/refractory (R/R) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We identified 1091 patients with R/R cHL who underwent ASCT between 2010-2022. In total, 244 (22%) received a PD-1 mAb and 443 (41%) received BV before ASCT, while 305 (28%) received BV maintenance. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching to assess the efficacy of BV maintenance in different patient subgroups. Among 608 matched patients, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 73% (95%CI 70-78) and 95% (95%CI 93-97), respectively. BV maintenance was associated with improved PFS for patients with no exposure to novel agents, especially those with 2+ modified AETHERA risk factors (0-1 factors, HR 0.51 ([95%CI 0.24-1.09], p=0.083; 2+ factors, HR 0.40 [95%CI 0.25-0.65], p<0.001). In contrast, BV maintenance was not associated with a significant PFS benefit for any patient subgroup who received novel agents before ASCT (BV-treated, 0-1, HR 1.43 [95%CI 0.53-3.81], p=0.48; 2+ HR 0.79 [95%CI 0.34-1.82], p=0.58; PD-1-treated, 0-1 (p>0.99), 2+ HR 0.25 [95%CI 0.03-2.14), p=0.21). In particular, we observed excellent outcomes for patients undergoing ASCT in a complete response after one line of PD-1-based salvage treatment with no significant benefit for BV maintenance observed (2-year PFS 100% vs 95%, p>0.99). The benefit of BV maintenance appears to be attenuated for patients receiving novel agents with salvage therapy. Omission of BV maintenance should be considered for patients anticipated to have excellent outcomes.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🔓 OA PDF 열기