Comparative efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus last prior treatment in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: growth modulation index analysis from the ROSEWOOD study.
[BACKGROUND] The phase II ROSEWOOD study (NCT03332017) compared zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab (ZO) with obinutuzumab monotherapy (O) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL
- 95% CI 1.6-4.9
APA
Trotman J, Bouabdallah K, et al. (2026). Comparative efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus last prior treatment in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: growth modulation index analysis from the ROSEWOOD study.. ESMO open, 11(4), 106942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106942
MLA
Trotman J, et al.. "Comparative efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus last prior treatment in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: growth modulation index analysis from the ROSEWOOD study.." ESMO open, vol. 11, no. 4, 2026, pp. 106942.
PMID
41922143
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The phase II ROSEWOOD study (NCT03332017) compared zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab (ZO) with obinutuzumab monotherapy (O) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) who had received two or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with ZO versus O [28.0 versus 10.4 months; hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.75].
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] In this post hoc analysis, an intra-patient comparative analysis was carried out using the growth modulation index (GMI) to analyze the efficacy of ZO versus the last prior treatment received by patients in the ROSEWOOD study. A GMI of ≥1.33 was used as a threshold for significant clinical activity.
[RESULTS] In the overall population, median GMI was 2.7 (95% CI 1.6-4.9) in the ZO arm and 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.7) in the O arm. Analysis in subgroups of clinical interest in the ZO arm showed that PFS was longer with ZO than with the last prior treatment, and median GMI was ≥1.33 in all subgroups tested. Overall, PFS had improved (GMI ≥1.33) in >60% of patients with R/R FL who received ZO versus their last prior treatment.
[CONCLUSIONS] This GMI analysis further supports the benefit of ZO as a novel therapeutic option for patients with R/R FL.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] In this post hoc analysis, an intra-patient comparative analysis was carried out using the growth modulation index (GMI) to analyze the efficacy of ZO versus the last prior treatment received by patients in the ROSEWOOD study. A GMI of ≥1.33 was used as a threshold for significant clinical activity.
[RESULTS] In the overall population, median GMI was 2.7 (95% CI 1.6-4.9) in the ZO arm and 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.7) in the O arm. Analysis in subgroups of clinical interest in the ZO arm showed that PFS was longer with ZO than with the last prior treatment, and median GMI was ≥1.33 in all subgroups tested. Overall, PFS had improved (GMI ≥1.33) in >60% of patients with R/R FL who received ZO versus their last prior treatment.
[CONCLUSIONS] This GMI analysis further supports the benefit of ZO as a novel therapeutic option for patients with R/R FL.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Lymphoma, Follicular; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aged; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Sulfonamides; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local