Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment of Disease Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Standard Therapy.
We report correlative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses from TRANSFORM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03575351) evaluating lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus standard of care (salvage
APA
Stepan L, Ansari S, et al. (2026). Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment of Disease Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Standard Therapy.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, JCO2503051. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-03051
MLA
Stepan L, et al.. "Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment of Disease Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Standard Therapy.." Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026, pp. JCO2503051.
PMID
42044466
Abstract
We report correlative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses from TRANSFORM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03575351) evaluating lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus standard of care (salvage immunochemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]) in second-line large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). ctDNA association with efficacy was investigated at predefined time points (random assignment, day 43, day 64, and day 126 [3 months after liso-cel, approximately 2 months after ASCT]) for 136 patients using ultrasensitive PhasED-Seq. ctDNA clearance (measurable residual disease [MRD]) predicted longer event-free survival (EFS) at all time points in both arms, with significantly more liso-cel-treated patients achieving MRD. Liso-cel demonstrated superior outcomes versus ASCT, including longer EFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response among patients in complete response (CR) and MRD. ctDNA re-emergence in patients with CR after ASCT confirmed its potential in predicting relapse. MRD remained significantly associated with EFS after adjusting for positron emission tomography (PET) response, while interaction testing revealed a significant interaction between PET status and treatment arm for EFS. Liso-cel achieved deeper, more durable molecular clearance by ctDNA, consistent with superior EFS and PFS versus ASCT for second-line LBCL treatment. ctDNA-MRD provided prognostic value beyond PET, supporting its role as a complementary biomarker for treatment response and relapse prediction.