본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A phase-I study of second-line S-IROX for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure.

1/5 보강
Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) 📖 저널 OA 11.3% 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 1/4 OA 2024: 2/10 OA 2025: 9/126 OA 2026: 10/53 OA 2022~2026 2024 Vol.41(8) p. 195
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
the second-line S-IROX regimen
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m).

Okuno M, Mukai T, Iwata K, Takagi A, Ito Y, Ohashi Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC).

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Okuno M, Mukai T, et al. (2024). A phase-I study of second-line S-IROX for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure.. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 41(8), 195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02438-x
MLA Okuno M, et al.. "A phase-I study of second-line S-IROX for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure.." Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), vol. 41, no. 8, 2024, pp. 195.
PMID 38967720 ↗

Abstract

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). When GnP therapy is selected, considering patient age or condition, second-line FOLFIRINOX is sometimes difficult to administer owing to its toxicity. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-IROX (S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combination) regimens in patients with unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure. This phase-I study used the "3 + 3" dose-escalation design with two dose levels. Patients who failed first-line GnP therapy for unresectable PC were enrolled. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1-7, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determination of RD. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of potential antitumor activity. Nine patients received the second-line S-IROX regimen. In level-0 (S-1, 80 mg/m; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m; and irinotecan, 120 mg/m), no patient experienced DLT; however, one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. At level-1 (irinotecan increased to 150 mg/m), one of six patients experienced DLTs, including G3 diarrhea. The RD was confirmed at the level-1 dose. The response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 33.3%, 77.8%, 172 (range:77-422) days, and 414 (101-685) days, respectively. One patient underwent surgery after the second-line S-IROX therapy. Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m).

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반