본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

1/5 보강
Scientific reports 📖 저널 OA 95.5% 2021: 24/24 OA 2022: 32/32 OA 2023: 45/45 OA 2024: 140/140 OA 2025: 938/938 OA 2026: 680/767 OA 2021~2026 2024 Vol.14(1) p. 16906
Retraction 확인
출처

Shibuki T, Otsuka T, Shimokawa M, Nakazawa J, Arima S, Fukahori M, Miwa K, Okabe Y, Koga F, Ueda Y, Kubotsu Y, Makiyama A, Shimokawa H, Takeshita S, Nishikawa K, Komori A, Otsu S, Hosokawa A, Sakai T, Oda H, Kawahira M, Arita S, Honda T, Taguchi H, Tsuneyoshi K, Kawaguchi Y, Fujita T, Sakae T, Nio K, Ide Y, Ureshino N, Shirakawa T, Mizuta T, Mitsugi K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 102
  • p-value P = 0.002
  • p-value P = 0.042

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Shibuki T, Otsuka T, et al. (2024). Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.. Scientific reports, 14(1), 16906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65689-8
MLA Shibuki T, et al.. "Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.." Scientific reports, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, pp. 16906.
PMID 39043707 ↗

Abstract

This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 4개

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기