Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group ( > 0.05). [CONCLUSION] Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas, is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis.
APA
Zhou SQ, Wan P, et al. (2024). Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.. World journal of clinical oncology, 15(7), 859-866. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.859
MLA
Zhou SQ, et al.. "Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.." World journal of clinical oncology, vol. 15, no. 7, 2024, pp. 859-866.
PMID
39071470
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas, is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a stage where the tumor has grown significantly but has not yet spread to distant organs, presents unique challenges in treatment. This article aims to discuss the current strategies, challenges, and future directions in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).
[AIM] To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC.
[METHODS] Eligible patients had LAPC, an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. In the observation group, participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk, and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-1 40 mg/m twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity). In the control group, participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From April 2020 to November 2021, 64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.
[RESULTS] Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy, while 32 (94.1%) received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group. Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients (32.4%), stable disease was evident in 19 patients (55.9%), and 4 patients (11.8%) experienced progressive disease; a partial response was observed in 6 (20.0%) patients, stable disease in 18 (60%), and progressive disease in 6 (20%) in the control group. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea. The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) was 26.5% (9/34) in the observation group and 23.3% (7/30) in the control group. There were no treatment-related deaths. The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo) ( < 0.05) and progression-free survival (12.2 mo 10.1 mo) ( < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group ( > 0.05).
[CONCLUSION] Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.
[AIM] To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC.
[METHODS] Eligible patients had LAPC, an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. In the observation group, participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk, and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-1 40 mg/m twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity). In the control group, participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From April 2020 to November 2021, 64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.
[RESULTS] Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy, while 32 (94.1%) received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group. Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients (32.4%), stable disease was evident in 19 patients (55.9%), and 4 patients (11.8%) experienced progressive disease; a partial response was observed in 6 (20.0%) patients, stable disease in 18 (60%), and progressive disease in 6 (20%) in the control group. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea. The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) was 26.5% (9/34) in the observation group and 23.3% (7/30) in the control group. There were no treatment-related deaths. The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo) ( < 0.05) and progression-free survival (12.2 mo 10.1 mo) ( < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group ( > 0.05).
[CONCLUSION] Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- Deep learning-assisted tumor radiomic dynamics on MRI predict pathological complete response in HCC undergoing immune-based therapy followed by hepatectomy.
- Durable complete response to tislelizumab plus cetuximab in a 94-year-old patient with advanced lower lip squamous cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review.
- Advancing precision in hepatocellular carcinoma prognostication: The promise of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based multimodal models.
- Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus S-1 and gemcitabine for liver metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.