Chemotherapy switch for nonresponse or progression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
45 patients in the cohort, 23 (51.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
resection
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
However, resection should be undertaken when feasible. CS may be considered in patients who do not respond to first-line chemotherapy.
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] Patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy present a challenge.
- p-value p = 0.082
APA
Hagerty BL, Fekrmandi F, et al. (2024). Chemotherapy switch for nonresponse or progression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.. Journal of surgical oncology, 130(5), 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27803
MLA
Hagerty BL, et al.. "Chemotherapy switch for nonresponse or progression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.." Journal of surgical oncology, vol. 130, no. 5, 2024, pp. 1014-1022.
PMID
39155683
Abstract
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] Patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy present a challenge. We sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of those patients to guide clinical practice.
[METHODS] Patients included were those without evidence of biochemical or radiographic response and no evidence of distant progression at the first reassessment after initiation of therapy.
[RESULTS] Of the 45 patients in the cohort, 23 (51.1%) proceeded to surgical exploration with all but one of those undergoing resection. The median overall survival of the study cohort was 28.6 and 48.6 months in those who underwent resection. A total of 13 patients (28.9%) underwent chemotherapy switch (CS) during their course of neoadjuvant therapy. The CS cohort demonstrated higher rates of radiologic progression (25% vs. 10%, p = 0.329), new or worse vascular involvement (58.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.082), and CA 19-9 increase (30.8% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.209) at initial re-staging. Despite this, overall survival was similar between the two groups (20.7 vs. 28.7 months, p = 0.674).
[CONCLUSION] Non-responders to first-line neoadjuvant therapy have poor rates of curative-intent resection. However, resection should be undertaken when feasible. CS may be considered in patients who do not respond to first-line chemotherapy.
[METHODS] Patients included were those without evidence of biochemical or radiographic response and no evidence of distant progression at the first reassessment after initiation of therapy.
[RESULTS] Of the 45 patients in the cohort, 23 (51.1%) proceeded to surgical exploration with all but one of those undergoing resection. The median overall survival of the study cohort was 28.6 and 48.6 months in those who underwent resection. A total of 13 patients (28.9%) underwent chemotherapy switch (CS) during their course of neoadjuvant therapy. The CS cohort demonstrated higher rates of radiologic progression (25% vs. 10%, p = 0.329), new or worse vascular involvement (58.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.082), and CA 19-9 increase (30.8% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.209) at initial re-staging. Despite this, overall survival was similar between the two groups (20.7 vs. 28.7 months, p = 0.674).
[CONCLUSION] Non-responders to first-line neoadjuvant therapy have poor rates of curative-intent resection. However, resection should be undertaken when feasible. CS may be considered in patients who do not respond to first-line chemotherapy.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Male; Female; Adenocarcinoma; Middle Aged; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progression; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Adult; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Pancreatectomy; Fluorouracil; Gemcitabine