Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
20 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery using ARAS.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
pancreatic surgery using ARAS
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Furthermore, patients in the ARAS group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.8 ± 6.6 17.9 ± 8.2 days, = 0.046). [CONCLUSIONS] ARAS is a safe and effective assistance system for pancreatic surgery, offering superior perioperative outcomes compared with standard procedures.
[OBJECTIVE] The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system (ARAS) specifically designed for pancreatic surgery and its impact on perioperative
APA
Javaheri H, Ghamarnejad O, et al. (2024). Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis.. Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 5(4), e516. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000516
MLA
Javaheri H, et al.. "Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis.." Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, vol. 5, no. 4, 2024, pp. e516.
PMID
39711676 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system (ARAS) specifically designed for pancreatic surgery and its impact on perioperative outcomes.
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic surgery remains highly complex and is associated with a high rate of perioperative complications. ARAS, as an intraoperative assistance system, has the potential to reduce these complications.
[METHODS] This prospective, single-center study included 20 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery using ARAS. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio with 60 patients from our retrospective data who underwent standard pancreatic resection. Matching variables were selected based on factors associated with poor intraoperative outcomes.
[RESULTS] A higher proportion of patients in the ARAS group were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20.0% 6.7%, = 0.085). Additionally, more patients in the ARAS group required arterial resection compared with the control group (15.0% 0.0%, = 0.002). Nevertheless, the ARAS group had a significantly shorter operative time (246 299 minutes, = 0.004) and required significantly fewer intraoperative blood transfusions (0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 1.4 units, = 0.014). None of the patients in the ARAS group had positive resection margins (0.0% 20.0%, = 0.045). Furthermore, patients in the ARAS group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.8 ± 6.6 17.9 ± 8.2 days, = 0.046).
[CONCLUSIONS] ARAS is a safe and effective assistance system for pancreatic surgery, offering superior perioperative outcomes compared with standard procedures.
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic surgery remains highly complex and is associated with a high rate of perioperative complications. ARAS, as an intraoperative assistance system, has the potential to reduce these complications.
[METHODS] This prospective, single-center study included 20 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery using ARAS. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio with 60 patients from our retrospective data who underwent standard pancreatic resection. Matching variables were selected based on factors associated with poor intraoperative outcomes.
[RESULTS] A higher proportion of patients in the ARAS group were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20.0% 6.7%, = 0.085). Additionally, more patients in the ARAS group required arterial resection compared with the control group (15.0% 0.0%, = 0.002). Nevertheless, the ARAS group had a significantly shorter operative time (246 299 minutes, = 0.004) and required significantly fewer intraoperative blood transfusions (0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 1.4 units, = 0.014). None of the patients in the ARAS group had positive resection margins (0.0% 20.0%, = 0.045). Furthermore, patients in the ARAS group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.8 ± 6.6 17.9 ± 8.2 days, = 0.046).
[CONCLUSIONS] ARAS is a safe and effective assistance system for pancreatic surgery, offering superior perioperative outcomes compared with standard procedures.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- A Streamlined Protocol for Developing a Clinicopathological Prediction Model for Patient Survival of Post-Resection of Pancreatic Cancer.
- Impaired insulin secretion via the Wnt5a/β-catenin pathway contributes to diabetes development in pancreatic cancer.
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and S-1 Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Randomized Phase II/III Prep-02/JSAP05 Trial.
- Preoperative Surgical or Endoscopic Bile Duct Drainage in Pancreatic Cancer.
- Augmented Reality Visualization and Navigation Operationalized in Biopsy of Indeterminate Splenic Mass.