본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Relative dose intensity of gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel combination as second-line or more in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

1/5 보강
Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology 📖 저널 OA 8.3% 2021: 0/1 OA 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 0/11 OA 2026: 3/22 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.49(5) p. 102583
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
116 patients were included, with a median RDI of 70 % (range, 20 %-114 %).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our results suggest that the level of GNP exposure, at a predefined RDI threshold of 70 %, had no significant effect on survival in our patients treated in L2+ for a/mPA.

Grancher A, Tagemouati L, Gillibert A, Schwarz L, Vernon V, Sefrioui D

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (GNP) is widely used in treating advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (a/mPA), but no data are available regarding its relative dose intensity (RDI)

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.04
  • p-value p = 0.008
  • HR 1.35

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Grancher A, Tagemouati L, et al. (2025). Relative dose intensity of gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel combination as second-line or more in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.. Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology, 49(5), 102583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102583
MLA Grancher A, et al.. "Relative dose intensity of gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel combination as second-line or more in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.." Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 5, 2025, pp. 102583.
PMID 40158796 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (GNP) is widely used in treating advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (a/mPA), but no data are available regarding its relative dose intensity (RDI) beyond the first line.

[AIM] To assess the impact of the RDI of GNP as second-line or greater therapy (L2+) for a/mPA.

[METHODS] Patients with a/mPA undergoing L2+ treatment were retrospectively included. The RDI was analysed from the start of GNP to the first CT scan. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analysed according to the RDI at a predefined threshold of 70 %.

[RESULTS] A total of 116 patients were included, with a median RDI of 70 % (range, 20 %-114 %). There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between RDI<70 % and ≥70 %, with median of 7.0 and 8.1 months (adjusted HR = 1.35; CI95 % [0.89-2.05]; p = 0.2) and 3.1 vs 3.4 months (adjusted HR = 1.36; CI95 % [0.91-2.05]; p = 0.14), respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicities were more common in RDI <70 % as compared to RDI ≥70 % (56.9 % vs. 37.9 %, p = 0.04) and responsible for more GNP dose reductions (67.7 % vs. 50 %, p = 0.13) and schedule modifications (72.4 % vs. 48.2 %, p = 0.008).

[CONCLUSION] Our results suggest that the level of GNP exposure, at a predefined RDI threshold of 70 %, had no significant effect on survival in our patients treated in L2+ for a/mPA. Alternative GNP regimens may be evaluated in patients undergoing L2+ treatment for a/mPA.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반