Clinical relevance of next-generation sequencing in patients aged 60 years or younger with pancreatic cancer: A Nationwide prospective cohort study.
코호트
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
318 patients, 88.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
tailored therapies
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Complete molecular profiling in PDAC patients ≤ 60 years showed moderate success (55 %) and limited clinical impact, with actionable findings in 13 % and therapy implementation in 3.5 %. Prioritizing KRAS testing and deeper sequencing in KRAS-wildtype tumors, alongside broader access to targeted therapies, may improve outcomes.
[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited therapeutic options and frequent resistance to standard treatments.
- p-value P < .001
- 연구 설계 cohort study
APA
Strijk GJ, van Dongen JC, et al. (2025). Clinical relevance of next-generation sequencing in patients aged 60 years or younger with pancreatic cancer: A Nationwide prospective cohort study.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 230, 116065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116065
MLA
Strijk GJ, et al.. "Clinical relevance of next-generation sequencing in patients aged 60 years or younger with pancreatic cancer: A Nationwide prospective cohort study.." European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), vol. 230, 2025, pp. 116065.
PMID
41129983 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited therapeutic options and frequent resistance to standard treatments. This study evaluates the feasibility and clinical impact of comprehensive tumor molecular profiling in PDAC patients aged ≤ 60 years.
[METHODS] Nationwide prospective cohort study across 13 Dutch hospitals from April 2021 to June 2024. PDAC patients aged ≤ 60 at any disease stage were included regardless of treatment status. DNA and RNA from tumor samples were isolated from representative, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS). A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board reviewed results monthly.
[RESULTS] Among 318 patients, 88.7 % (282/318) had tumor samples suitable for sequencing. WES and WTS were completed in 175 patients (55.0 %), with WTS alone in 88 (27.7 %). Complete molecular analysis was more often successful in resection specimens than in biopsy samples (79 % vs 33 %; P < .001). Unknown germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes were identified in 4 % (13/318) of patients. Actionable alterations were detected in 13.2 % (42/318), rising to 22.3 % (39/175) among patients with WES and WTS. Actionable targets were found in 92.3 % (12/13) KRAS-wildtype tumors. Only 11 of 42 (26.2 %) patients received tailored therapies.
[CONCLUSIONS] Complete molecular profiling in PDAC patients ≤ 60 years showed moderate success (55 %) and limited clinical impact, with actionable findings in 13 % and therapy implementation in 3.5 %. Prioritizing KRAS testing and deeper sequencing in KRAS-wildtype tumors, alongside broader access to targeted therapies, may improve outcomes.
[METHODS] Nationwide prospective cohort study across 13 Dutch hospitals from April 2021 to June 2024. PDAC patients aged ≤ 60 at any disease stage were included regardless of treatment status. DNA and RNA from tumor samples were isolated from representative, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS). A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board reviewed results monthly.
[RESULTS] Among 318 patients, 88.7 % (282/318) had tumor samples suitable for sequencing. WES and WTS were completed in 175 patients (55.0 %), with WTS alone in 88 (27.7 %). Complete molecular analysis was more often successful in resection specimens than in biopsy samples (79 % vs 33 %; P < .001). Unknown germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes were identified in 4 % (13/318) of patients. Actionable alterations were detected in 13.2 % (42/318), rising to 22.3 % (39/175) among patients with WES and WTS. Actionable targets were found in 92.3 % (12/13) KRAS-wildtype tumors. Only 11 of 42 (26.2 %) patients received tailored therapies.
[CONCLUSIONS] Complete molecular profiling in PDAC patients ≤ 60 years showed moderate success (55 %) and limited clinical impact, with actionable findings in 13 % and therapy implementation in 3.5 %. Prioritizing KRAS testing and deeper sequencing in KRAS-wildtype tumors, alongside broader access to targeted therapies, may improve outcomes.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.