Reappraising the Role of Intraoperative Neck Margin Revision in Postneoadjuvant Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
671 patients included, 524 (78.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
CR-EB, 119 (17
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
At multivariable analysis, neck margin status was not independently associated with survival and recurrence. [CONCLUSIONS] Conversion of an initially positive pancreatic neck margin by additional resection is not associated with oncologic benefits in postneoadjuvant PD and cannot be routinely recommended.
[OBJECTIVE] To investigate whether revision of pancreatic neck margin based on intraoperative frozen section analysis has oncologic value in postneoadjuvant pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic d
APA
Malleo G, Lionetto G, et al. (2025). Reappraising the Role of Intraoperative Neck Margin Revision in Postneoadjuvant Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.. Annals of surgery, 282(6), 1092-1101. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006322
MLA
Malleo G, et al.. "Reappraising the Role of Intraoperative Neck Margin Revision in Postneoadjuvant Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis.." Annals of surgery, vol. 282, no. 6, 2025, pp. 1092-1101.
PMID
38708617 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] To investigate whether revision of pancreatic neck margin based on intraoperative frozen section analysis has oncologic value in postneoadjuvant pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
[BACKGROUND] The role of intraoperative neck margin revision has been controversial, with little information specific to postneoadjuvant PD.
[METHODS] Patients who underwent postneoadjuvant PD (2013-2019) for conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with frozen section analysis of neck margin at 3 academic institutions were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were compared across 3 groups: complete resection achieved en bloc (CR-EB), complete resection achieved non-en bloc (CR-NEB), and incomplete resection (IR).
[RESULTS] Among the 671 patients included, 524 (78.1%) underwent CR-EB, 119 (17.7%) CR-NEB and 28 (4.2%) IR. Patients undergoing CR-NEB and IR exhibited larger tumors and lower rates of "Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors" response, requiring vascular resections more often. Likewise, CR-NEB and IR were associated with a worse pathologic profile than CR-EB. The incidence of postoperative complications and access to adjuvant treatment were comparable among groups. A CR-EB was associated with the longest OS duration (34.3 months). In patients with positive neck margin, obtaining a CR-NEB through reexcision was associated with a comparable OS relative to patients with an IR (26.9 vs 27.1 months, P = 0.901). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. At multivariable analysis, neck margin status was not independently associated with survival and recurrence.
[CONCLUSIONS] Conversion of an initially positive pancreatic neck margin by additional resection is not associated with oncologic benefits in postneoadjuvant PD and cannot be routinely recommended.
[BACKGROUND] The role of intraoperative neck margin revision has been controversial, with little information specific to postneoadjuvant PD.
[METHODS] Patients who underwent postneoadjuvant PD (2013-2019) for conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with frozen section analysis of neck margin at 3 academic institutions were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were compared across 3 groups: complete resection achieved en bloc (CR-EB), complete resection achieved non-en bloc (CR-NEB), and incomplete resection (IR).
[RESULTS] Among the 671 patients included, 524 (78.1%) underwent CR-EB, 119 (17.7%) CR-NEB and 28 (4.2%) IR. Patients undergoing CR-NEB and IR exhibited larger tumors and lower rates of "Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors" response, requiring vascular resections more often. Likewise, CR-NEB and IR were associated with a worse pathologic profile than CR-EB. The incidence of postoperative complications and access to adjuvant treatment were comparable among groups. A CR-EB was associated with the longest OS duration (34.3 months). In patients with positive neck margin, obtaining a CR-NEB through reexcision was associated with a comparable OS relative to patients with an IR (26.9 vs 27.1 months, P = 0.901). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. At multivariable analysis, neck margin status was not independently associated with survival and recurrence.
[CONCLUSIONS] Conversion of an initially positive pancreatic neck margin by additional resection is not associated with oncologic benefits in postneoadjuvant PD and cannot be routinely recommended.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
- Humans
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Margins of Excision
- Male
- Carcinoma
- Pancreatic Ductal
- Female
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Middle Aged
- Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Frozen Sections
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Survival Rate
- neck margin revision
- neoadjuvant treatment
- pancreatectomy
- pancreatic cancer
- pancreatoduodenectomy
- survival
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.