Prevalence, clinicopathological features, and prognosis of diabetes in pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 1620 patients.
코호트
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1620 patients, 536 (33.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] DM is common in PC and associates with distinct clinicopathological profiles. NODM is linked to jaundice and poorer survival, while DM status serves as an independent prognostic factor in the curative-surgery subgroup, with part of NODM's adverse effect operating through bilirubin.
[BACKGROUND] The interplay between pancreatic cancer (PC) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is complex, and may differ between new-onset DM (NODM) and long-standing DM (LSDM).
- p-value p = 0.008
- 95% CI -1.04 to -0.09
APA
Li Y, Xiang S, et al. (2025). Prevalence, clinicopathological features, and prognosis of diabetes in pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 1620 patients.. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 25(8), 1465-1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.11.004
MLA
Li Y, et al.. "Prevalence, clinicopathological features, and prognosis of diabetes in pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 1620 patients.." Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], vol. 25, no. 8, 2025, pp. 1465-1472.
PMID
41274804
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The interplay between pancreatic cancer (PC) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is complex, and may differ between new-onset DM (NODM) and long-standing DM (LSDM). We compared clinical features and prognosis across non-DM, NODM, and LSDM groups.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 1620 PC patients treated at the National Cancer Center (2008-2018). Patients were classified as non-DM, NODM (≤2 years), and LSDM (>2 years). Survival outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, and mediation analysis was applied to evaluate indirect effects.
[RESULTS] Of 1620 patients, 536 (33.1 %) had DM, including 287 (53.4 % of DM) with NODM. NODM was associated with higher jaundice prevalence and elevated liver function markers; LSDM patients were older, had a greater prevalence of hypertension, and showed lower M stage. Non-DM patients had lower CA19-9, CA242, and CEA than both DM groups. Overall survival was significantly worse in NODM than in LSDM and non-DM. In curatively resected patients, DM status (non-DM/NODM/LSDM) independently predicted OS in multivariable models. Mediation analysis indicated total bilirubin accounted for 9.8 % of the adverse association between NODM and OS (ACME -0.46, 95 % CI -1.04 to -0.09; p = 0.008).
[CONCLUSION] DM is common in PC and associates with distinct clinicopathological profiles. NODM is linked to jaundice and poorer survival, while DM status serves as an independent prognostic factor in the curative-surgery subgroup, with part of NODM's adverse effect operating through bilirubin.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 1620 PC patients treated at the National Cancer Center (2008-2018). Patients were classified as non-DM, NODM (≤2 years), and LSDM (>2 years). Survival outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, and mediation analysis was applied to evaluate indirect effects.
[RESULTS] Of 1620 patients, 536 (33.1 %) had DM, including 287 (53.4 % of DM) with NODM. NODM was associated with higher jaundice prevalence and elevated liver function markers; LSDM patients were older, had a greater prevalence of hypertension, and showed lower M stage. Non-DM patients had lower CA19-9, CA242, and CEA than both DM groups. Overall survival was significantly worse in NODM than in LSDM and non-DM. In curatively resected patients, DM status (non-DM/NODM/LSDM) independently predicted OS in multivariable models. Mediation analysis indicated total bilirubin accounted for 9.8 % of the adverse association between NODM and OS (ACME -0.46, 95 % CI -1.04 to -0.09; p = 0.008).
[CONCLUSION] DM is common in PC and associates with distinct clinicopathological profiles. NODM is linked to jaundice and poorer survival, while DM status serves as an independent prognostic factor in the curative-surgery subgroup, with part of NODM's adverse effect operating through bilirubin.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Prognosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Prevalence; Aged, 80 and over; Adult
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- The efficacy of botulinum toxin type A treatment and surgery for acute acquired comitant esotropia.
- Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) for the treatment of depression: A randomized, double-blind, placebo, controlled trial in China.
- Hyaluronic Acid Compound Filling Plus Mesotherapy vs Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Horizontal Neck Lines: A Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Prospective Study in Chinese Subjects.
- Correction to: Hyaluronic Acid Compound Filling Plus Mesotherapy vs Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Horizontal Neck Lines: A Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Prospective Study in Chinese Subjects.
- The use of botulinum toxin A in upper lip augmentation.