Carbon ion radiotherapy optimization techniques for pancreatic cancer: accounting for the effect of bowel gas variation.
[BACKGROUND] Dose variation due to changes in bowel air poses significant challenges for carbon radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer.
APA
Sheen C, Lee S, et al. (2026). Carbon ion radiotherapy optimization techniques for pancreatic cancer: accounting for the effect of bowel gas variation.. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 202(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02450-8
MLA
Sheen C, et al.. "Carbon ion radiotherapy optimization techniques for pancreatic cancer: accounting for the effect of bowel gas variation.." Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], vol. 202, no. 1, 2026, pp. 84-94.
PMID
40839042
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Dose variation due to changes in bowel air poses significant challenges for carbon radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer. This retrospective study evaluated a density-override optimization technique to mitigate dosimetric uncertainties caused by bowel air changes.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Planning CT and cone-beam CT data from 8 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy were analyzed. Treatment simulations used a dose of 55.2 GyE in 12 fractions with a four-field setup (anterior, lateral, posterior, posterior oblique). Four density-override patterns were compared: pattern 0 (no override), pattern 1 (replacing bowel gas with water), pattern 2 (replacing the entire bowel with mean bowel HU), and pattern 3 (replacing bowel gas with mean bowel HU). Dose evaluations included fraction-wise and accumulated dose analyses, focusing on target coverage, homogeneity index, and organs at risk doses.
[RESULTS] Pattern 2 achieved the largest clinical tumor volume coverage and the fewest fractions with > 5% coverage loss for the anterior beam, followed by pattern 3. However, pattern 2 demonstrated poorer homogeneity for the lateral beam compared to patterns 1 and 3 and a higher gastrointestinal (GI) dose for the anterior beam.
[CONCLUSION] This study evaluated the importance of density overrides to address bowel air variations. For patients where a more uniform dose is desirable or whose tumor is adjacent to the GI tract, a pattern 3 density-override should be considered.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Planning CT and cone-beam CT data from 8 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy were analyzed. Treatment simulations used a dose of 55.2 GyE in 12 fractions with a four-field setup (anterior, lateral, posterior, posterior oblique). Four density-override patterns were compared: pattern 0 (no override), pattern 1 (replacing bowel gas with water), pattern 2 (replacing the entire bowel with mean bowel HU), and pattern 3 (replacing bowel gas with mean bowel HU). Dose evaluations included fraction-wise and accumulated dose analyses, focusing on target coverage, homogeneity index, and organs at risk doses.
[RESULTS] Pattern 2 achieved the largest clinical tumor volume coverage and the fewest fractions with > 5% coverage loss for the anterior beam, followed by pattern 3. However, pattern 2 demonstrated poorer homogeneity for the lateral beam compared to patterns 1 and 3 and a higher gastrointestinal (GI) dose for the anterior beam.
[CONCLUSION] This study evaluated the importance of density overrides to address bowel air variations. For patients where a more uniform dose is desirable or whose tumor is adjacent to the GI tract, a pattern 3 density-override should be considered.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Heavy Ion Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Retrospective Studies; Radiotherapy Dosage; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Male; Female; Aged; Radiosurgery; Intestines; Air; Middle Aged; Organs at Risk