From radiomics to transformers in pancreatic cancer detection and prognosis.
메타분석
1/5 보강
[INTRODUCTION] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies, primarily due to late diagnosis and poor therapeutic response.
- 연구 설계 systematic review
APA
Almufareh MF, Tehsin S, et al. (2025). From radiomics to transformers in pancreatic cancer detection and prognosis.. Frontiers in medicine, 12, 1731922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1731922
MLA
Almufareh MF, et al.. "From radiomics to transformers in pancreatic cancer detection and prognosis.." Frontiers in medicine, vol. 12, 2025, pp. 1731922.
PMID
41585265 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies, primarily due to late diagnosis and poor therapeutic response. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in medical imaging and multi-modal data integration, have created new opportunities for improving early detection and personalized prognostication.
[METHODS] This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. The protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025.
[RESULTS] Distinct from prior surveys that focus narrowly on specific algorithms or data types, this work introduces a generational taxonomy of AI approaches-ranging from classical radiomics-based machine learning to deep learning and contemporary transformer-based models-and maps their application to core clinical tasks such as detection, segmentation, classification, and outcome prediction. A key contribution is the integration of diverse datasets across imaging, pathology, and molecular sources; we further assess trends in availability, usage, and sample scale.
[DISCUSSION] We critically evaluate limitations in generalizability, external validation, model calibration, and translational readiness, and outline recommendations for multi-center validation, standardized reporting, domain adaptation, and clinician-centered interpretability.
[SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2DVHJ.
[METHODS] This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. The protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025.
[RESULTS] Distinct from prior surveys that focus narrowly on specific algorithms or data types, this work introduces a generational taxonomy of AI approaches-ranging from classical radiomics-based machine learning to deep learning and contemporary transformer-based models-and maps their application to core clinical tasks such as detection, segmentation, classification, and outcome prediction. A key contribution is the integration of diverse datasets across imaging, pathology, and molecular sources; we further assess trends in availability, usage, and sample scale.
[DISCUSSION] We critically evaluate limitations in generalizability, external validation, model calibration, and translational readiness, and outline recommendations for multi-center validation, standardized reporting, domain adaptation, and clinician-centered interpretability.
[SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2DVHJ.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Reforming the delivery of smoking cessation: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of providing smoking cessation as part of targeted lung cancer screening.
- Lung Cancer Screening in Adults: State-of-the-Art and Policy Mapping (2025).
- LCMS-Net: Deep Learning for Raw High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data Applied to Forensic Cause-of-Death Screening.
- System-Wide Implementation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Value-Based Care Setting.
- The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer.