Endoscopic Ultrasound-Lavage Technique for Pancreatic Cancer: An In Vivo Pilot Study.
: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very poor 5-year survival and prognosis.
APA
Abe T, Kato M, et al. (2026). Endoscopic Ultrasound-Lavage Technique for Pancreatic Cancer: An In Vivo Pilot Study.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020230
MLA
Abe T, et al.. "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Lavage Technique for Pancreatic Cancer: An In Vivo Pilot Study.." Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 2, 2026.
PMID
41594206
Abstract
: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very poor 5-year survival and prognosis. Even when CT or MRI shows no metastasis, staging laparoscopy(SL) still detects tiny peritoneal deposits in 20-30% of patients, making them ineligible for surgery. SL is invasive, requiring general anesthesia and substantial resources. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows the observation of the bile ducts, pancreas, and abdominal cavity, and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is essential for pathological diagnosis. Reports on using EUS to perform peritoneal lavage cytology are currently not available. We hypothesized that combining EUS-FNA with peritoneal lavage (EUS-lavage technique; EUS-LT) could enhance staging accuracy and avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. : Ten in vivo porcine models underwent EUS-LT. Using a 19G FNA needle, 800 mL saline was instilled into the intraperitoneal cavity and then recovered. Two refinements were introduced sequentially: an ENBD catheter with additional side holes and, subsequently, a side-hole introducer (EndoSheather) that eliminated balloon dilation. The primary endpoint was procedural success. Secondary endpoints included safety, complications, recovered volume, duration of endoscopic procedure, and time required to instill 800 mL. Nonparametric tests compared outcomes across iterations. : Ten-model porcine in vivo model series were included, and all procedures were successful. No device malfunctions or unanticipated technical failures; one minor mucosal injury during saline injection resolved after re-puncture. The average procedure time was 31.1 min. Stepwise refinements shortened procedure and infusion times and increased recovered volume. Recovered volume approached the instilled amount in later cases, indicating efficient performance. : In this ten-model in vivo series, EUS-LT demonstrated technical feasibility and short-term safety.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer and positive peritoneal cytology who underwent upfront surgery.
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2025 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis.
- ZNF282 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Progression Possibly via E2F1 Activation.
- Alteration of Apolipoprotein A2 Isoforms is Associated With the Progression of Chronic Pancreatitis.
- Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage in Gastric Cancer Surgery and the Preventive Effect of Duodenal Stump Reinforcement.