본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Who Do We Fail to Rescue After Pancreatoduodenectomy? Outcomes Among >4000 Procedures Expose Windows of Opportunity.

Annals of surgery 2026 Vol.283(2) p. 277-285

Kinny-Köster B, Halm D, Tran D, Kaiser J, Heckler M, Hank T, Hinz U, Berchtold C, Al-Saeedi M, Roth S, Mehrabi A, Marchegiani G, Büchler MW, Loos M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] Our investigation on in-hospital mortality after 4474 pancreatoduodenectomies aimed to identify time-dependent risks as well as windows of opportunity to rescue patients from complications

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P =0.008
  • p-value P <0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kinny-Köster B, Halm D, et al. (2026). Who Do We Fail to Rescue After Pancreatoduodenectomy? Outcomes Among >4000 Procedures Expose Windows of Opportunity.. Annals of surgery, 283(2), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006429
MLA Kinny-Köster B, et al.. "Who Do We Fail to Rescue After Pancreatoduodenectomy? Outcomes Among >4000 Procedures Expose Windows of Opportunity.." Annals of surgery, vol. 283, no. 2, 2026, pp. 277-285.
PMID 38967356

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] Our investigation on in-hospital mortality after 4474 pancreatoduodenectomies aimed to identify time-dependent risks as well as windows of opportunity to rescue patients from complications.

[BACKGROUND] Pancreatoduodenectomy is generally considered a safe procedure with a 1% to 10% perioperative mortality based on complexity and surgical volume. Yet, patients are susceptible to life-threatening complications particularly with extended resections. Recognition of distinct vulnerabilities over time while patients recover is required to permit focused monitoring, sophisticated resource allocation, and the greatest surgical safety.

[METHODS] Patients who deceased in-hospital after pancreatoduodenectomy between 2003 and 2021 were retrieved from the institutional pancreatectomy registry and analyzed in detail with respect to their postoperative course.

[RESULTS] Among 4474 pancreatoduodenectomies, 156 patients deceased in-hospital (3.5%). When assessing root causes of mortality, we observed 3 different clusters of complications, which were postpancreatectomy-specific (51.9%), visceral vasculature-associated (25.6%), or cardiopulmonary in origin (17.9%). The median times of root cause onset in the 3 categories were postoperative day (POD) 9, POD 4.5 ( P =0.008), and POD 3 ( P <0.001), respectively. Medians of in-hospital mortality were POD 31, POD 18 ( P =0.009), and POD 8 ( P <0.001). Intervals between root cause onset and mortality varied with medians of 23 days, 11 days ( P =0.017), and 1 day ( P <0.001). The 3 categories were similarly distributed between different types of surgical complexity.

[CONCLUSIONS] Postpancreatectomy-specific complications prompt almost half of the in-hospital mortalities after pancreatoduodenectomy, with rather long intervals for interventions to prevent failure to rescue. In contrast, visceral vasculature-related events and cardiopulmonary complications dominate early in-hospital mortalities with short intervals until mortality, demanding rigorous management of such events or preoperative conditioning. These data externally validate a previous high-volume initiative and highlight distinct windows of opportunity to optimize perioperative safety.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Female; Male; Hospital Mortality; Postoperative Complications; Aged; Middle Aged; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Failure to Rescue, Health Care