Association between pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and mortality in pancreatic cancer: a matched case-control study.
환자-대조
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1247 patients were included: 756 (61 %) who died within one year and 491 (39 %) who survived.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] There is an overall decrease in mortality among PERT-users compared to non-users. The results may be overly optimistic due to potential confounding factors related to patient selection, and randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects.
[BACKGROUND] Malnutrition and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) are common among patients with pancreatic cancer.
- p-value p = 0.001
APA
Dugic A, Hagström H, et al. (2026). Association between pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and mortality in pancreatic cancer: a matched case-control study.. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 26(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.12.008
MLA
Dugic A, et al.. "Association between pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and mortality in pancreatic cancer: a matched case-control study.." Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], vol. 26, no. 1, 2026, pp. 130-137.
PMID
41387158 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Malnutrition and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) are common among patients with pancreatic cancer. Despite the potential of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to correct PEI, its association with survival remains uncertain. Our study aimed to evaluate the trend in PERT prescription and its potential association with mortality among patients with pancreatic cancer.
[METHODS] We included patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) discussed at a tertiary hospital tumor board between 2008-2012 and 2015-2018. Cases (deceased within one year) were matched 1:1 with controls (alive at one year). Patients were classified as PERT users or non-users based on prescriptions after PDAC diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression assessed the association between PERT usage and all-cause mortality at one-year post-diagnosis.
[RESULTS] A total of 1247 patients were included: 756 (61 %) who died within one year and 491 (39 %) who survived. PERT prescriptions increased over time, particularly in the palliative setting (46 % vs. 75 %, p = 0.001). Matching yielded 487 pairs. In the full population, PERT use was associated with lower one-year mortality (adjusted OR 0.49, 95 %CI = 0.34-0.71). Similar associations were seen among subgroups undergoing surgery (aOR 0.34, 95 %CI = 0.16-0.74) and those receiving best supportive care (aOR 0.12, 95 %CI = 0.03-0.33). In the chemotherapy-only subgroup, the direction of effect suggested a potential risk reduction, but without statistical significance (aOR 0.75, 95 %CI = 0.44-1.24).
[CONCLUSION] There is an overall decrease in mortality among PERT-users compared to non-users. The results may be overly optimistic due to potential confounding factors related to patient selection, and randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects.
[METHODS] We included patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) discussed at a tertiary hospital tumor board between 2008-2012 and 2015-2018. Cases (deceased within one year) were matched 1:1 with controls (alive at one year). Patients were classified as PERT users or non-users based on prescriptions after PDAC diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression assessed the association between PERT usage and all-cause mortality at one-year post-diagnosis.
[RESULTS] A total of 1247 patients were included: 756 (61 %) who died within one year and 491 (39 %) who survived. PERT prescriptions increased over time, particularly in the palliative setting (46 % vs. 75 %, p = 0.001). Matching yielded 487 pairs. In the full population, PERT use was associated with lower one-year mortality (adjusted OR 0.49, 95 %CI = 0.34-0.71). Similar associations were seen among subgroups undergoing surgery (aOR 0.34, 95 %CI = 0.16-0.74) and those receiving best supportive care (aOR 0.12, 95 %CI = 0.03-0.33). In the chemotherapy-only subgroup, the direction of effect suggested a potential risk reduction, but without statistical significance (aOR 0.75, 95 %CI = 0.44-1.24).
[CONCLUSION] There is an overall decrease in mortality among PERT-users compared to non-users. The results may be overly optimistic due to potential confounding factors related to patient selection, and randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.