본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Does Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer Have Similar Outcomes Compared With Primary Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer?

1/5 보강
Journal of surgical oncology 📖 저널 OA 30.3% 2021: 0/5 OA 2022: 3/11 OA 2023: 4/7 OA 2024: 9/34 OA 2025: 25/52 OA 2026: 21/58 OA 2021~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
147 participants (84 male and 63 female) were retrospectively analyzed.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Does Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer Have Similar Outcomes
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Primary Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer?
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Sakamoto S, Tabuchi M, Tokumaru T, Uemura S, Tamura S, Yoshimatsu R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] The survival difference between recurrent pancreatic cancer (Rec-PC) and primary metastatic PC (PM-PC) remains inadequately understood.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.03
  • p-value p < 0.01
  • 95% CI 1.42-3.69
  • HR 2.29

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sakamoto S, Tabuchi M, et al. (2026). Does Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer Have Similar Outcomes Compared With Primary Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer?. Journal of surgical oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70222
MLA Sakamoto S, et al.. "Does Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer Have Similar Outcomes Compared With Primary Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer?." Journal of surgical oncology, 2026.
PMID 41766110 ↗
DOI 10.1002/jso.70222

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] The survival difference between recurrent pancreatic cancer (Rec-PC) and primary metastatic PC (PM-PC) remains inadequately understood.

[METHODS] Eligible participants received combination chemotherapy with either gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or FOLFIRINOX. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with Rec-PC and those with PM-PC.

[RESULTS] Data from 147 participants (84 male and 63 female) were retrospectively analyzed. The Rec-PC group demonstrated significantly longer OS (median: 12.7 months) than the PM-PC group (median: 8.4 months) (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, Rec-PC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.84; p < 0.01), presence of peritoneal dissemination (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.42-3.69; p < 0.01), receipt of second-line chemotherapy (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.55; p < 0.01), receipt of any local therapy (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23-0.77; p < 0.01), and prognostic nutritional index < 40 (HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.55-4.04; p < 0.01) were identified as independent prognostic factors.

[CONCLUSIONS] Rec-PC was identified as a favorable prognostic factor after adjusting for established prognostic indicators (registration number: NCT06921252).

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반