본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Survival outcomes and prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in third-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

1/5 보강
Frontiers in oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 15/15 OA 2022: 98/98 OA 2023: 60/60 OA 2024: 189/189 OA 2025: 1004/1004 OA 2026: 620/620 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.16() p. 1713376 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
95 patients with mPDAC treated with third-line systemic therapy.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) appear to be potentially useful tools for identifying candidates suitable for further systemic treatment. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Vidulin J, Ondruš D, Pöršök Ś, Kráčalíková M, Ušáková V, Šuták K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a very poor prognosis.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Vidulin J, Ondruš D, et al. (2026). Survival outcomes and prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in third-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.. Frontiers in oncology, 16, 1713376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1713376
MLA Vidulin J, et al.. "Survival outcomes and prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in third-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 16, 2026, pp. 1713376.
PMID 41952681 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a very poor prognosis. Currently, there is no standardized therapeutic approach for third-line systemic treatment. The aim of this retrospective/prospective study was to evaluate survival outcomes in patients treated in the third-line setting and to analyze the impact of nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

[METHODS] The analysis retrospectively and prospectively included 95 patients with mPDAC treated with third-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from the Slovak Pancreas Registry. Data were collected from 13 hospitals. Baseline chemotherapy regimens, ECOG, nutritional, and inflammatory parameters were recorded and used to calculate prognostic scores (PNI, CRP, NLR, SII, SIRI, GPS). Their association with OS and PFS was analyzed using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

[RESULTS] The most frequently used regimen was FOLFOX/CAPOX (56 patients), followed by nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI, 24 patients) and capecitabine (11 patients). The median OS was 5.55 months and the median PFS was 3.29 months. A PNI > 40.5 was significantly associated with longer OS (6.34 vs. 3.32 months,  = 0.001) and PFS (3.71 vs. 2.76 months,  = 0.009). Lower GPS scores were significantly associated with improved OS ( = 0.006) and PFS ( = 0.027). Other inflammatory markers (NLR, SIRI, SII, CRP) did not show a statistically significant impact on OS or PFS.

[CONCLUSION] Third-line systemic therapy may offer clinical benefit in selected mPDAC patients, particularly in those with favorable nutritional-inflammatory profiles. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) appear to be potentially useful tools for identifying candidates suitable for further systemic treatment. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기