본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Labiaplasty: Mind the Gap-How the Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery Industry Has Exposed Gaps in Modern Medical Anatomy Education.

Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology 2026 Vol.242() p. 109-120 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Is
TL;DR This chapter focuses on specific challenges faced by the modern anatomist when teaching female genital anatomy in response to the increasing popularity of the female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) industry and the diversification of gender in contemporary society.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues Anatomy and Medical Technology Diversity and Career in Medicine

Hayes JA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 현대 해부학 교육이 여성 생식기 해부학의 다양성을 충분히 반영하지 못하고 있으며, 이는 여성 생식기 미용 수술(FGCS) 산업의 확산과 젠더 다양성 인식 증가라는 사회적 맥락에서 해부학 교육의 공백을 드러낸다는 점을 규명하고자 한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Jennifer A. Hayes (2026). Labiaplasty: Mind the Gap-How the Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery Industry Has Exposed Gaps in Modern Medical Anatomy Education.. Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 242, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16680-7_9
MLA Jennifer A. Hayes. "Labiaplasty: Mind the Gap-How the Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery Industry Has Exposed Gaps in Modern Medical Anatomy Education.." Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, vol. 242, 2026, pp. 109-120.
PMID 41677874

Abstract

Anatomy is often considered to be a static discipline, but advances in radiological and surgical techniques regularly change structural viewpoints, and the modern anatomist teaches into an ever-changing socio-political context. This chapter focuses on specific challenges faced by the modern anatomist when teaching female genital anatomy in response to the increasing popularity of the female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) industry and the diversification of gender in contemporary society. A qualitative methodological approach was used to explore how female genital anatomy is represented in contemporary scientific literature, anatomical textbooks, and anatomy education. An evidence base for normal female genital anatomy was identified using 12 population-based studies that recorded genital dimensions and confirmed that a wide variation is normal. An analysis of 78 historic and contemporary anatomy texts mapped representations of female genital anatomy over time and confirmed that the spectrum of normal genital appearance is not acknowledged in English-language anatomy textbooks. A series of semi-structured interviews with Australian anatomists identified barriers and facilitators for teaching genital anatomy. Barriers included lack of connection to contemporary clinical practice, technical difficulty and time involved in updating presentations, the crowded curriculum, and personal reticence about teaching genital anatomy. Themes around inclusivity also emerged during the interviews, with anatomists reporting reluctance to experiment with inclusive terminology as another barrier to teaching genital anatomy. The binary language and singular structural arrangements traditionally contained in lectures and textbook chapters on "Female Genital Anatomy" are nowadays rendered exclusive and incomplete. It is imperative that the modern anatomist, when developing anatomy curricula and resources, considers the importance of teaching about anatomical variation and using inclusive language given that many contemporary societies are embracing nonbinary views of gender.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 genital scispacy 1
약물 Gap-How scispacy 1
질환 Themes scispacy 1
기타 Female Genital scispacy 1
기타 Genital scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Genitalia, Female; Surgery, Plastic; Vulva; Anatomy; Education, Medical