본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Decision support tools for pancreatic cancer detection: external validation in Australian primary care - a retrospective cohort study.

코호트 2/5 보강
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2026 Vol.76(765) p. e319-e328 OA Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Rese
TL;DR None of the risk assessment tools developed to aid early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in primary care settings were strongly predictive of pancreatic cancer when applied to Australian primary care data.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI PMC OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-30

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: undiagnosed pancreatic cancer using Australian primary care data
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] When applied to Australian primary care data, none of the tools were strongly predictive of pancreatic cancer. New diagnostic models incorporating additional data could potentially improve their predictive performance.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Schrader S, Rafiq M, Martinez-Gutierrez J, Waterhouse M, Lee B, Neale RE

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

None of the risk assessment tools developed to aid early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in primary care settings were strongly predictive of pancreatic cancer when applied to Australian primary care d

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Silja Schrader, Meena Rafiq, et al. (2026). Decision support tools for pancreatic cancer detection: external validation in Australian primary care - a retrospective cohort study.. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 76(765), e319-e328. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0328
MLA Silja Schrader, et al.. "Decision support tools for pancreatic cancer detection: external validation in Australian primary care - a retrospective cohort study.." The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, vol. 76, no. 765, 2026, pp. e319-e328.
PMID 41494778 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor survival. Risk assessment tools have been developed to aid early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in primary care settings (QCancer, electronic Risk Assessment Tool [eRAT], and the Queensland Institute of Medical Research [QIMR] Berghofer Pancreatic Cancer Decision Support Tool [QPaC Tool]) but have not been validated in the Australian setting.

[AIM] To estimate and compare the performance of these tools for identifying patients with undiagnosed pancreatic cancer using Australian primary care data.

[DESIGN AND SETTING] A cohort study was conducted using linked primary care and cancer registry data from Victoria, Australia.

[METHOD] Patients presenting to primary care with signs and/or symptoms included in the tools (recorded in the primary care 'reason for encounter') were included. Diagnostic accuracy statistics for each tool (and their individual signs and symptoms) were compared.

[RESULTS] Patients with pancreatic cancer were more likely (<0.001) to present with new-onset diabetes, jaundice, and unexpected weight loss pre-diagnosis than patients without pancreatic cancer. The most common pre-diagnostic presentations in patients with pancreatic cancer were jaundice (29.0%), abdominal pain (25.6%), change in bowel habits (17.6%), and new-onset diabetes (14.8%). Jaundice, steatorrhoea, and pancreatitis had the highest positive predictive values (PPV) for pancreatic cancer (1.96%, 1.77%, and 0.89%, respectively). Among the tools, eRAT had the highest PPV of 1.37% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.66); the PPV for QPaC was 1.01% (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.22) and QCancer was 0.8% (95% CI = 0.54 to 1.15).

[CONCLUSION] When applied to Australian primary care data, none of the tools were strongly predictive of pancreatic cancer. New diagnostic models incorporating additional data could potentially improve their predictive performance.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기